This story is unavailable.

Oliver to me is one of the key examples of how this draft is one of the deepest in ages. A few years ago there was a player named Tony Mitchell from a small school who flashed the kind of perimeter skills/athletic ability combo that Oliver has, except Mitchell was just not good at basketball and it was reflected in his stats — I think he shot like 28% from 3 and fouled out of a ton of games and his team didn’t come close to the tournament. But he was drafted where Oliver is probably going to go, like mid-second round. You have to do way less projecting/wishful thinking on Oliver than on Mitchell, but he costs the same. I think that’s crazy. This draft I think is a little softer at the top than what people are saying but much much deeper Han anything we’ve seen in a while. This is also the problem with Bradley, because there are 5 or 6 other big men that are very similar. What is the case for Bradley over, say, Thomas Bryant if they’re both there?

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Sam Margolin’s story.