David Butterworth
Sep 6, 2018 · 2 min read

It is difficult to talk about deep and complex issues like racism and sexism without it appearing as though you are just issuing platitudes. Part of that is, as you suggest, an unwillingness to do what it would take to actually address these issues.

In addition, I think it is also due to disagreements on the scope of the issue. So many have their head in the sand and deny these are still issues. Even among those who acknowledge racism or sexism often downplay the seriousness of the issue or focus on supposed progress rather than remaining injustice.

While I agree that supporting unions is part of the solution to racism and sexism, it is hardly the only solution or by itself a solution.

The real problem I have with this article is the zero sum attitude. Rather than present the case for supporting unions and try to convince liberals to join in that support as a effective way to combat sexism and racism, the article insults and alienates those it ought to be trying to convince.

The final paragraph makes clear that the goal of this article is to encourage us to ignore those who are not talking about supporting unions rather than try to convince them to offer support. It seems to me the author is more concerned with appearing more sincere in their efforts compared to others rather than actually being more sincere or inspiring others.

David Butterworth

Written by

No more or less important than anyone else

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade