“Our City,” Or How There Is No Inclusion Without Justice

I moved to San Francisco four years ago after a few years of trying in vain, and spent every last dime I had doing it. Since then, I’ve lived in market-rate and rent-controlled housing, been totally broke and not broke, been a tech worker, an hourly canvasser, a tenants’ rights activist, and struggled to find a job at all. Lately, I’ve heard a lot of kvetching about how Jane Kim’s mayoral campaign message of “This is our city. Let’s take it back” is “divisive”, “not inclusive”, “zero-sum”, “us vs. them”.

To which I have to say: Have you looked around San Francisco lately?

From the SF Chronicle: it’s only gotten worse since 2012.

It is us vs them: not “transplants vs. natives,” but San Franciscans versus the extreme concentration of money and power that entrenches racism and classism, pits us against one another, and oversaw an exodus of black, Latinx, and immigrant communities from our city, who are systematically locked out of new well-paying jobs and high-end housing while targeted by eviction and mass incarceration. MIT economist David Autor calls the Bay Area a ‘barbell shaped economy’, with “well-paid “knowledge economy” jobs at the top end of the market, and loads of low-paid service sector jobs at the bottom.” SF income inequality is currently comparable to sub-Saharan Africa. I, a transplant and ex-techie myself, am part of this system. So are you.

The new prosperity brought by SF’s boom hasn’t shared its enormous gains with people of color, women, immigrants, queer and trans youth, our unhoused neighbors, and working-class San Franciscans trying to get by. That’s not “divisive”, it’s reality, and acknowledging it is the first step. In the last four years, I’ve watched our richest and most powerful residents, mostly white male billionaires, spend millions of dollars trying to take away homeless neighbors’ tents, undermine nonprofit affordable housing developers, exploit domestic violence victims’ stories against their will, block commonsense regulations on short-term rentals, and co-opt women’s narratives in their political spending. I’ve also watched those same leaders oppose reforms from the inside, perpetuate racist and sexist work environments for women and people of color who are underrepresented and underpaid, and fire workers for attempting to bargain collectively.

There’s a lot of vitriol going around, but even the newest white-collar worker has more in common with the marginalized folks in our city than they do with the entitled dudes at the top who are exercising their financial muscle in our city’s politics. We’re all workers, we’re rent-burdened, we’re trying to make a home for ourselves. Why should we side with the billionaires whose mansions we pay for with our labor, to whom we are expendable, over the majority of our neighbors who are systemically shut out of this new Gilded Age, where corporations are people and money is speech?

“A city for all San Franciscans” is meaningless without “justice for all San Franciscans.” We can’t talk about inclusion without addressing that the top 1% of San Franciscans makes 44 times more on average than the bottom 99%.

Working to address the severe imbalance of power, privilege and inequality in this city isn’t “playing a zero-sum game” or “pulling up the ladder,” and it doesn’t make you less of a person to admit that that imbalance exists and that you may benefit from it.

It makes you a better San Franciscan.

That’s why I’m supporting Jane Kim for Mayor:

Source: twitter.com/janekim

These are the policies that lift all of us up together by giving every San Franciscan a fair shot in a deeply unequal city. Every time Jane has fought for these policies to meet the mass demands of every day San Franciscans, people have called her “divisive”, without stopping to question the conditions of economic and racial injustice that divide us today and create progress for the few at the expense of the many. Speaking as an activist daughter of immigrants (like Jane), they’re missing the point: the powerful divide people against each other to stay in power. To quote another activist daughter of immigrants I admire, Grace Lee Boggs:

“Our challenge, as we enter the new millennium, is to deepen the commonalities and the bonds between these tens of millions, while at the same time continuing to address the issues within our local communities by struggles that not only say “No” to the existing power structure but also empower our constituencies to embrace the power within each of us to create the world anew.”

Let’s actually embrace the power of every San Franciscan, no matter where we came from how long ago or how little money we make, and take this city back from those who profit by dividing us. On June 5, cast your vote for Jane Kim: a mayor for the many, not the few.

Image from https://www.facebook.com/JaneKimCA/

Opinions are solely the author’s own and not representative of any organizations with which she is affiliated.