Shachar Haad
Jul 24, 2017 · 3 min read

A) Trump is “losing” or is “wrong”

Being a conservative, you most likely believe that Obama was wrong. That’s to be expected, as he was petitioning on the opposite side, promoting policies that you didn’t agree with.

He is losing when he goes out and proclaims that the proposal to fix Obamacare is “mean” and when he shows a lack of knowledge about the proposal. He doesn’t show a strong front, yet. I accept that a large part of it has to do with the left continuous attack on him.

Yet, he is president, not them.

This is a weak argument in favor of Trump, considering that half of America didn’t vote at all. It is true that they ran a campaign of slander against him and that a large portion of the support that Hillary got was due to that campaign but this isn’t really a victory for either party. It indicates a failure in the democratic system.

This is also not something against the man but I think it’s a weaker argument than you realize.

B) Trump is stupid

Stupid is not really an argument. In 1919, Henry Ford once sued the Chicago Tribune for libel for calling him an ‘anarchist’ and “ignorant idealist.” I’d say that Trump is in good company.

If I can talk about myself for a moment, I am what you would call stupid. School was never of any interest to me and I couldn’t concentrate in any form of schooling. Needless to say that the grades I got there were laughable, at best which means that I didn’t even bother with any form of higher education.

I would support most stupid people, as they are the most real and intelligent. Too many academics seem to be simpering buffoons that can’t argue their point without touting religion and asserting some moral dominance beforehand. Not to insult you or other rational individuals, of course, but I see too many of those ‘academics.’

Every time someone says that Trump is stupid, I like him a little more. They don’t understand that he’s talking with his supporters and the people open to hearing him, not with the elite that can’t understand someone who doesn’t play by their rules. I don’t think he’s stupid but someone who either refuse to get his message across or just doesn’t care to.

He beat them with 1/5 the money in the election.

Yes, and it tells more about his financial intelligence than that of the opposition.

C) He shouldn’t tweet

I both agree and disagree with this. Sure, most of what he says is not “presidential” (well, neither is getting a blowjob in the oval office but you’ll rarely see anyone on the left addresses it) but seeing as most other platforms use their time slandering him, I can understand his need to talk with his support base.

Saying that there too many instances where he talks himself into a corner with those tweets, with some of them being poor character attacks or parroting something he saw on TV. He needs a bit more forethought.

D) He shouldn’t talk to Russia or have meetings with Russia

Becuase foreign affairs are suddenly a bad thing? What about talking to Israel (who the left decided one day to be the evilest ever) or certain other countries in the Middle-East who are the source of much of the terrorism around the world (that the left refuses to acknowledge)?

Seeing as there is no shred of evidence to the “Russians are coming” narrative, Russia currently has a better standing than Saudi-Arabia.

This is just another example of Democrats being insufferable twits (that’s my new favorite word).

I thought the left was the party of peace.

Well, considering that ran a long campaign of painting any and all Republican as “deplorable” and inserting their ideology into higher-education, the media, and Hollywood, then this nonsense is a likely eventuality. In reality, they stand for little to no values and most of their campaigns are akin to “well, at least we’re not Republicans.”

This is part of the problem on the right. We have played by those rules in the past and we get nowhere.

I like that Trump plays by his own rules. I just wish he could fine-tune them to actually accomplish something. Find a way to use their own tactics against them in a complex game of chess where they lose by trying to protect all of their pawns.

Well, that’s just my stupid opinion on it.