You proved you have no argument the moment you used ‘mansplaining.’
Clinton did campaign on the ground that she’s a women and even invited a popular feminist to shame other women who chose not to vote for her.
The idea behind the astrophysicist is based on the equivilance of clinton presidency and identity politics. There was no way Clinton would have been a successful president. You just try to act dumb as though this wasn’t clear.
Lastly, you didn’t actually argued against any of the relevant points, which might indicate that to you, it doesn’t matter the character of a person. Just the identity politics that go along with that person.