Why Russell Brand should not stand for Parliament



Or why it wouldn’t be worth his time… A better reply than Russell put forward why trying to force change from within the system is futile


On Thursday night I watched BBC Question Time (full episode here)

The show was billed as a Russell Brand versus Nigel Farage showdown. Well, I imagine that got the viewing rating numbers up in comparison to a normal show.

In actuality it was anti-climatic. The format of Question Time doesn’t allow for proper debate — I would much rather see Russell and ol’ Nigel face up in a format following the UK General Election debates.

Be properly moderated and allow the speakers to get into some sort of flow. QT has too many panelists and David Dimbleby seemed unusually leniant in allowing the audience to bicker and run the show. At one point I thought a punch-up was about to break out.

Russell seemed a bit constrained by the environment and didn’t have the space to get his points across as eloquently as he does with his daily Trews episode. I imagine the week he’s had on the front pages with the Sun screaming “HYPOCRITE” meant he was double-keen to do well.

There is a back-story to the part of the show I want to write about. A gentleman in the audience challenged (well… attacked) Russell for not campaigning from within the system and standing as a politician.

At this point watch the video below…

Turns out this guy is the brother of a UKIP MEP so his attack wasn’t from a unbiased point of view.

Russell’s answer was “my problem would be, mate, I’d stand for Parliament but I’d be scared that I’d become one of them”

I think Russell has indirectly answered the question about changing the system from within in a much more convincing way in his book and on his YouTube channel.

Let’s imagine that he stood as an MP — either for the Green party or as an independent. I think we’d have a new MP with a lot of social conscience, great hair and fantastic boots. But it wouldn’t make a bit of difference to the problems that we face in the UK today.

We already have credible, honest politicians. I’d put Tom Watson and Caroline Lucas forward as examples. But these people cannot change the system as it stands.

I’ve been reading “The Prostitute State” by Donnachadh McCarthy. From his experiences inside the Liberal Democrats he exposes the levels of influence that corporate lobbying has on modern British democracy. How transglobal corporations can buy policy changes for money. Policy changes that further the opportunities for that corporation to make more money and extend their influence.

Donnachadh also exposes the influence of the media on British politics and in particular Rupert Murdochs spindly claws grabbing the heart of the establishment.

Ironically Murdochs newspapers have been obsessed with Brand this month. If you can’t attack the idea, attack the person.

Or to quote Eleanor Roosevelt:

Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

The Sun will force you into a small mindset through mis-direction and personal attacks, distracting you from the real issues at hand.


So why should Russell stand to be an MP again? The system won’t change in the presence of a good, honest MP otherwise we’d have voted one in by now.

Corporate influence has our political system sewn up tight and change won’t be possible unless it comes from outside the system. And incidentally not delivered by Russell Brand. The change needs to come from us.

We can deliver change in a much faster way through direct action. Much faster than it would take to be elected as an MP and to try and dismantle a system gripped by external influence.

There was an interesting moment when one lady made her voice audible through the background noise of UKIP supporters grumbling menacingly about immigration.

Watch below

We spend so much time talking about immigration, it’s a side-issue when you think about what happened in 2008.
We have been robbed, and we are still being robbed. The amount of taxation that is not being paid by the very rich is an absolute scandal. Why aren’t we talking about that

At which point Dimbleby swiftly and with no shame moves the conversation on. THAT was the absolute scandal of the night.

What should we do next?


I want to issue a call to action. There are movements currently in action to enact change in our society through peaceful, non-violent, direct action.

If you’ve been listening to Russell Brand, or if you read “The Prostitute State” you might be inspired to get involved and help.

On December 20th — 21st Occupy Democracy are meeting in Parliament Square to continue to bring pressure on the Government to reform UK politics. Untangling our democractic system from the clenches of corporations that lobby our political parties isn’t going to be easy, but you can help

Have a look at Occupy Democracy on their website or Facebook page and consider getting involved.

We can’t wait for the next General Election to hope that people will make a positive change. We can’t stand for Parliament and neither can Russell Brand regardless of “angry-UKIP-MEP-brother” man because changing the system would take a life-time.

We don’t need a new leader — forget the great hair and amazing boots (Sorry, Russ). All we need to do is turn up and make our voices heard.

See you on December 20th in Parliament Square.