Twitter Suspends Real Whistleblower Adrian Bond for Politely Asking Brian Stilter if He’s a Pansy
This morning, shortly after Qanon reappeared after 93 days as promised on the newly-launched and highly-anticipated 8kun.net, I found my Twitter account promptly suspended, evidently for asking political commentator, Brian Stelter, whether he is a pansy. No profanity, no insults, no innuendos, no aggression, no threats, no quid pro quo. Twitter claims that, by simply asking him about this, I was “promoting violence against, threatening, or harassing” him.

I must admit I find the timing quite ripe, considering I’m a recent whistleblower — and an actual one, not an Adam Schift-produced, Democrat, political operative with an Orwellian axe to grind. I confess I used to be a Democrat, growing up in Hollywood, working all over the entertainment industry, and rubbing elbows with scores of celebrities — or rubbing more than elbows, as in the case of my sexy little dancing scene with Nicole Kidman in one of her films, or racing Lindsay Lohan around trying to score million dollar diamonds and elude paparazzi, or rushing the Canadian Embassy with Pamela Anderson for PETA in an effort to save the seals. There’s a Democrat fog upon Hollywood and I was a Democrat.
A Democrat who, on September 11, 2018, became a whistleblower and helped make sure certain exculpatory evidence exonerating President Trump of the Russian Collusion Hoax got to the right people at the White House (meaning non-swamp creatures). A Democrat who helped another whistleblower connect with the right people, after initially going to notorious characters in this show who have been unmasked as Deep State clowns, puppets, and punks. A Democrat who voted neither for HUSSEIN nor for any Republican that I can recall, including President Trump…but who as an ex-Democrat will absolutely be voting for President Trump in 2020.
And even though I saw through Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s charade since his his candidacy and never voted for him, I still considered myself a Democrat up until the attempted character assassination of Justice Kavanaugh. In years past, I even voted for corrupt, complicit, even seditious and treasonous Democrats like Adam Schiff and Diane Feinstein, something that rankles me to this day. After all, I’m part African-American and we’re supposed to not think critically about these things — just keep voting Democrat.
But in 2018, I officially walked away from the Democrat Party, registering as an Independent, and voted, for the first time ever, for a Republican. In fact, I voted for every Republican I possibly could, so disgusted was I by the sheer evil I saw perpetuated by senior Democrats against Justice Kavanaugh. But the year prior, 2017, I still considered myself Democrat, until certain events and associations precipated my whistleblowing role in the Russian Collusion Hoax. Thus, I can emphatically state that I am truly a non-partisan whistleblower, beholden to neither primary political party, and most assuredly NOT a CIA agent like Eric “Charley” Ciaramella (previously, I rejected an invitation from the CIA to apply in the categories of “administration, surveillance, recognissance, or elimination,” but that’s another story). I was surprised but honored to discover that Deep State-persecuted General Flynn is among my followers, as I see him as a modern day patriotic hero. Never would have imagined it, but I’ve never been more proud to be American, now with President Donald Trump at the helm.

So I’m wondering if Twitter suspended my account as soon as Qanon reappeared not for asking Mr. Stelter if he’s a pansy, but rather for simply being a patriotic, African-American ex-Democrat whistleblower from the entertainment industry who not only supports President Trump and Blexit but follows Qanon. All that I’ve personally experienced and researched is entirely corroborated, without exception, by the content and clues constituting Qanon’s drops. And since Twitter’s been censoring and suppressing me, shadowbanning my account, slashing my followers, hiding likes and retweets, and all the other strategic shenanigans for quite a few years now, I wouldn’t be surprised. I recall one morning I arose and found Twitter had slashed my followers by some 75%. It likely bothers them they can’t accuse me of being a white supremist since I’m significantly mixed, with just as much African-American, Native American, and Mexican genes as I have English and German ones). At any rate, we shall see: here’s my letter of appeal I emailed to Twitter this morning.
Hello, Twitter.
I believe my account has been suspended in error, for I am not guilty as charged.
In my tweet that triggered this suspension, I didn’t berate or insult Mr. Stelter in any way, nor was it my intention. I think he’s a great guy for his role. As Chief Media Correspondent for CNN, Mr. Stelter would no doubt appreciate all of the widely-rotated independent content I’ve shot, edited, produced, (“made happened”) for CNN over the years. I can’t count the number of tired nights when I would personally deliver content at Sunset and Cahuenga at 4 in the morning. So whether independently contracted or not, we both worked for the same Man.
As Twitter is no doubt aware, Mr. Stelter is a political commentator, and is well-known as a divisive character in his sphere. It’s clear to see that he is a celebrity of sorts in the social media political world. Asking a person of public interest to clarify the nature of his character is hardly “promoting violence against, threatening, or harassing” him. Since Mr. Stelter has injected himself in such a divisive and partisan manner (offensively, some opine) into an arena well within the purview of current and ongoing social, legal, socioeconomic, and political culture — he falls quite squarely in the category of public interest. However, even though Mr. Stelter and I have vastly different political views, I didn’t insult him about it in any way. I can’t imagine how he could have remotely found my question offensive.
Pondering how my tweet could possibly be worthy of suspension, I wondered if it were falsely construed that I insulted Mr. Stelter’s perceived sexual orientation. I can assure you this not the case. Having worked and partied with celebrities who command even greater notoriety than Mr. Stelter, I am comfortable and friendly with different types of people with many types of persuasions and preferences. Frankly, I don’t care what Mr. Stelter’s sexuality is — it’s not something I even think about. But if I have indeed inadvertently offended his sexuality, then obviously I would most profusely apologise, and with great speed and alacrity.
Here’s the thing. As Twitter is no doubt aware (since I shared a lot about it here), I have been afforded Whistleblower Protection as of September, 2018, in regards to the Russian Collusion Hoax — which now appears to be morphing into the Impeachment Hoax and so is ongoing. As you might imagine, life for me now is radically different than it used to be, and communicating on my Twitter feed is rather vital — especially now with the return of Qanon. Arguably, suspending my account may actually increase my threat level.
I’m more than happy to issue a public apology to Mr. Stelter if he feels my question insulted his sexuality. Having grown up in Hollywood, I have many gay friends whom I love and cherish, so I would absolutely hate for him to think that was the case. But I must request that my current account suspension be lifted immediately, as I clearly didn’t violate any threat or harassment protocols. I think Twitter’s rules against threats, aggression, and harassment are great, when correctly and appropriately applied. Mr. Stelter and I may continue to have political differences, but we should be able to communicate with each other in a non-threatening, non-aggressive, profanity-free fashion — especially in this historic, epically critical phase of America known by many as #TheStorm.
Best,
Adrian Bond

Hopefully, Twitter will see that I’ve tweeted nothing even remotely warranting suspension and will reinstate my account. It’s sad that things have gotten to this point, but from what I’ve gleaned recently in both the social media/big tech world and the political sphere — I’m really not surprised. American patriots truly need First Amendment protection when it comes to the social online square, especially during the next 12 months leading up to the 2020 election.