Jesus was a Negro.

Saint Columba Abbey Press

39 min readMar 15, 2024

Be Proper. Proprius Favilla.

By Trenton Garmon

Proprius Favilla

Being Proper

“Jesus was a Negro”

~ Reason for One Positive Spiritual Step in Being Proper ~

TRENTON GARMON

Favilla! [Spark]

Being Proper I Proprius Favilla

“Jesus was a Negro.”

by Trenton Garmon

Printed in the United States of America

International Standard Book Number (ISBN) (Paperback): 979–8–373988–21–6

All rights reserved. Except in the case of section or brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews, no portion of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means — electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, scanning, or other — without the prior written permission from the author.

St. Columba Abbey Press titles are provided by an Angel Proprietor DBA and may be purchased in bulk for educational, business, fundraising, or sales promotional use. For information please contact St. Columba via stcolumbaabbeypress@gmail.com

**ZERO Artificial Intelligence was utilized in drafting this book or any books in the Favilla Series. Trenton Garmon confirms every word was written by hand by him or typed, lay editing, with or without professional editing.

Published with printers in New York and Tampa.

Being Proper I Proprius Favilla

Table of Contents

Preface…6

Special Thanks, Citing and Resources Noted…9

Introduction…12

The Apostles Creed…16

Being Proper…17–43

Political Disclaimer …44

Conclusion … 47

— — — — —

The intention of this book is to peacefully prompt your mind and spirit to awaken and take one positive spiritual step towards “being proper” or proprius favilla within God’s design and plans. And if you lead others, to encourage you to press on in your Christian service until He returns or we go to be with Him, His Mother and the Saints.

— — — — —

Preface

It was a “loop” of a YouTube channel or video spiral which started with worship music, then the reading of scripture and then I heard — “Jesus was a Negro.” Perhaps it was a dream, I think not. In fact, I got up out of bed when I heard the AI speak those four words. I had listened for hours in the background to worship and then scripture being read with input as to certain meanings of a passage all as videos were strung together. Then the book of Galatians was being read and I heard: “Jesus was a Negro.”

A very peculiar thing to hear — or simply believe you heard. And for the sake of consideration of the offerings of this book and its related content — I am merely asking you to believe that the statement has theological value in a practical way and paradigm shift of sorts. For there are two things certain about Jesus.

Jesus was a “brown man” or he was a “black” man — however one would care to utilize those terms. He was most certainly not “white” according to any scale. He certainly was not a believer in “Democracy” and he was not a slave owner — nor did he exclude people based upon ethnicity. He included and excluded based upon His Identity and His election with our free will response being simply to believe which is “being” and thereafter “do”. Obey — Keep His Commandments.

For it is not a hypothetical to offer that Jesus was a negro because the context would actually be Biblical and the most proper if considering the use of the traditional term. That was a respected term simply referring to African origin. It was not limited to even a “person” rather used for description of dark colored natural soaps, dark colored leather stains, dark colored chocolate. And for certain when referring to geography, the term relates to the area known as Africa — which includes the northern area known as Egypt. So yes — consider that it is true and proper to say — as I believed I heard — that “Jesus was a Negro.”

So how considering that term and our lack of righteousness when compared to the life of Jesus — with that awareness leading hopefully to a next step. What is the reader to do? How are we to better orient our lives on Christ by considering that it is proper to say — Jesus was a negro. He was called out of Egypt. He went into Egypt with Joseph and Mary — thus being an actual African — at least to the seasonal truth of the regard.

It seems best to reorient ourselves or be introspective based upon the “proper” timing of God and His Sovereignty about even where we are born and when. For the book of Acts bears witness to same and God is not ‘limited’ by your location — your family of origin or your current economic situation. Rather God desires that we orient ourselves on His Perfect Plan. And Jesus being an African was a part of God’s perfect plan.

Hence — consider for the sake of spiritual growth, encouragement, humility or one of the virtues — that it is proper to say that Jesus was African. A negro. A beautiful man seasoned by the challenges of life, albeit never sinning, and even being told testimonies by Joseph and Mary of His time in Egypt with perhaps some recollection from such an early age given Jesus is God. Does that offend you to consider? If so, how are you limiting yourself by considering your place of origin or family of origin inferior? For that is the inverse effect of limiting Jesus — objecting that “Jesus could not be considered a Negro”. For the proper term is positive. Are you believing that Jesus’ would be limited or was limited by that reality — that He spent time in Egypt, Africa.

And if so — what family of origin, denomination or otherwise faith limitation are you believing about yourself. Do you find that your family “holds you down” because you believe some barrier due to their sin and mistakes? Do you believe you are inferior intellectually because your nation or state has a history of being impoverished or not as “civilized”? When we orient ourselves on the true identity of Jesus specifically as found in the Eucharist — we become more and more alive — we discover more and more deeply our purpose and we become more ordered towards Sainthood.

Before you get too beside yourself, should your conscience remain “hung up” on the title — note Father Mitch Pacwah has even used the term in a basic Biblical exposition on the show Scripture & Tradition. The academics of the terms, speak for themselves and there is only grace, spiritual identity and a positive next step intended by the usage of every single term.

So consider — Jesus was an African. Yes — “Jesus was a Negro”. Let it be. And let your seasons of life, family of origin and place of birth “be”. For out of Egypt — God called His Son. And so He also has purpose for every season and predetermined relationship of the Perfect Plan God has for your life.

Be Happy. Be Holy (orderly).

Your friend and neighbor,

-Trent

SPECIAL THANKS, CITING AND RESOURCES NOTED

It required forty-four years to #dotheprocess and reach a place of saying for a pragmatic with wholesome intentions and in good faith this basic statement: “Jesus was either a brown man, or a black man; but most certainly He was not a white man”.

So special thanks to all my friends over the years of every race, creed, religion, facial structure, hair composition, both genders and specifically my friends from the African continent. And I do not mean African-Americans primarily but those who in the five (5) trips to African soil that the Lord has blessed me with that reflected the great love of Christ in my well intended pursuit to “evangelize the world”, which I believed included unreached Africa.

Special thanks specifically to the Roman Catholic Priest in West Africa who offered and served me a glass of water that day in or around 2005. Being a fool on fire for Jesus from half-way around the world walking those dusty streets with my Bible in hand, believing that I had reached more “lost people” to share Jesus’ love with, ended up being a complete “flip of the Script” — but not until years later. For in those moments — now recollecting back my own thoughts — that African priest — who I must say had the darkest, purest looking chocolate skin said very little. In fact, I only recall him offering the glass of water and literally bringing in a single glass of water — with no ice — and allowing me to sit at a table. The entire church felt settled. There was little to no “dust” stirred up the moments after I sat down. And I received no lecture. No “prostelized message”. Nothing but a smile, the glass of water and he walked away. He went and sat, reading some book and clearly humming some prayer.

Here I was tired, convinced that I had been doing “God’s work” by fulfilling the Southern Baptist Convention’s assigned mission to “track the unreached people groups of West Africa”. And yet I had stumbled upon this quiet Kingdom hiding in plain view. It was right there — in west Africa. In that priest — in the peace of that place, in the icons, in the priestly robe, in the intentions of every piece of furniture and now I understand even in the design of each Parish. And certainly all because the peace of God was there in the form of the Eucharist. Not a black man’s Sacred Bread or a white man’s Sacred Bread — not in waters designated for “One Tribe” — but the Kingdom was and remains present in all tribes — by way of the presence of Jesus in the Eucharist.

And after years of blocking in football for my African-American friends, drinking beer and fishing and otherwise listening to a Southern Baptist version of the Gospel — which does properly include “Baptism”. A conversion occurred which allowed me to now look back and realize that the West African Priest had actually better preached the Gospel to me in that single glass of water than any pastor or priest — at least contextually and organizationally. For that African priest served me in the name of Jesus without any expectation of a return. He was fueled and otherwise empowered with the Eucharist. And He was peering from inside the Kingdom of God into my soul as I shared a few thoughts about being “born again” before I left — all of course utilizing the very water that he offered which wet my throat.

So you see to “be proper” one does not necessarily have to use words. And yet words have a profound impact. Specifically when misused and when a word is used in an abusive manner to demean or defame others. Thus, the use of the word “Negro” is vital to distinguish as being used in its proper terms. There is no degradation intended rather an actual acknowledgment that our Savior was called out of Egypt where He likely spent sufficient time to be considered an African — at least for an “immigration” form the Holy Family would have likely filled out today. He was not born in Africa — but His very own nation rejected Him as did the Roman Authorities. The venturing into Northern Africa was predestined and fulfilled scripture. So thanks be to God for that West African priest who preached the Gospel so deeply into my soul with that single cup of water that it burns as a witness against me today. A witness of my presumptive nature.

Thanks also be to Dr. Clifton Clark and Roy Smith for leading “mission” trips that did call for baptism to the African nation. Thank you for your objective teachings, the safe trips, the great examples of seeking God. And specifically thanks be to Dr. Clarke for the witness of a life of an English man who is proper in every way a Christian would be expected. I know of neither of those men any Ten Commandments breach and the use of the name of Jesus was never in vanity, so I would discern. Your spirits of service to those who have not heard of Jesus and otherwise not been baptized remains convicting and encouraging.

A special note should also be made and thanks to Pastor Ricky Tillis. As a pastor vested with great faith in the Scripture and also empowered with sufficient grace to plant a church in a difficult area — your example and the opportunity to serve in ministry which you first provided is an eternal blessing. For which I am grateful. Your passionate preaching of God’s charity and your consistency with your family and flock are a great witness of being proper. Proper in a Kingdom light and appropriate covenant of baptism perspective.

Appreciation for Pastor Henry Tellis for prayers during my “college days” of extreme sports with rock & roll parties. Thanks also to Father Eric of St. Bernards Catholic Church for the blessing of St. Blaise. And for the teachings of Cardnal Sarah. Without listing every friend of African descent or “Elect Member of the Tribe of Canna” who has impacted my life — note simply my appreciation for Christian love on the journey of self-orientation within God’s will. For truly the Lord’s will is that all be saved. And He was called out of Egypt, Africa.

INTRODUCTION

There are multiple relationship perspectives on ethniticy and race with regards to comparison, contrasting and community. The most objective appears to be that God designed tribes for a purpose. That families of origin are intended to reflect the beauty and diversity of God in creation. That “liking” someone who looks like you is normal and also accepting and finding value in those who appear differently is of God. Therefore, one must consider how do we categorize ‘race’ and otherwise visible differences in humans? Are we in an evolutionary scale or one that limits people groups to “less favor”. The current state of many’s perspective appears to be so — specifically with regards to a “true” Israel.

As a Catholic it appears that true Israel in this “dispensation” are those who receive the Eucharist. The baptized Church and those who are thus receiving the same species which is that of Jesus in the Sacred Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. So of all tribes — we become One Family — in the Eucharist. Those are the true Israel. Children of every tribe — all Sons and Daugthers of Israel. And yes — Jesus was a brown man. Jesus was a Negro. It is indisputable. And thus as part of the practice of self examination. Or examination of consciousness. One should consider — how is his or her orientation based upon race and ethniticy. Are you including and excluding based upon tribal identity? Is one considering a tribe of more value to Israel than another tribe? Is one considering the Lost Tribes proof — that there is no real ethnic Israel that can be established — to be mere theory. For it does appear that much of the Zion Israel promotion to the neglect or otherwise double standard application of law wherein Palestanians are due protection — is based upon misorientation. We are to orient based upon Jesus the King and His Church — His Kingdom which includes His Holy Mother and the true Twelve Tribes.

So consider being proper. Consider re-ordering your life based upon the Eucharist — after baptism of course. That is the process and that is how one can better become entrenched in the security of a spiritual identity. Yes — much work and many steps remain. But you are not inferior based upon your family of origin and inversely there is no tribe superior.

The term “proper” in Latin is “proprius” meaning “one’s own, particular to itself,” from pro privo “for the individual, in particular,” from ablative of privus “one’s own, individual” (see private (adj.)) + pro “for” (see pro-). Related: Properly; properness.” The term property stems from the chain of title being “proper” as to ownership. So being “proper” is not being unnecessarily pious. And saying Jesus was a Negro is proper. In “1300, propre, “adapted to some purpose, fit, apt; commendable, excellent” (sometimes ironic), from Old French propre “own, particular; exact, neat, fitting, appropriate” (11c.) and directly from Latin proprius “one’s own, particular to itself,” from pro privo “for the individual, in particular,” from ablative of privus “one’s own, individual” (see private (adj.)) + pro “for” (see pro-). Related: Properly; properness. As an adverb, “very exceedingly,”” Hence the term has never really had a negative connotation. For being proper is being appropriate in the context.

APOSTLES CREED

I believe in God,
the Father almighty,
Creator of heaven and earth,
and in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died and was buried;
he descended into hell;
on the third day he rose again from the dead;
he ascended into heaven,
and is seated at the right hand of God the Father almighty;
from there he will come to judge the living and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and life everlasting.

Amen.

BEING PROPER MEANS IGNORING SCANDAL

It is bound to occur when one is proper and seeking to maintain identity and orientation. Others will realize their lack of proper direction and experience a sense of lacking virtue in his or her identity. If one is lost — those who are heading in the right direction are a challenge if the one lost is unwilling to rethink and otherwise reorient. And often those are blind guides would experience too great a “wounding of their pride” to admit mis-orientation. And hence — he or she gets into a pride of life cycle. And refuses to rethink. So expect “scandal” if you are seeking to be proper. Simply writing ‘Jesus was a Negro’ seems scandeleous based upon my own family and faith of origin. As well as area. For in southeast United States — specifically as a Southern Baptist — and of Irish descent — entangling the name “Jesus” with the term “Negro” do not positively comport without reorientation. “Negro” was utilized often as a degragorty term used to tell a “black person” to “get in line” or otherwise shape up to some social standard. But that is an improper understanding of the actual term. And it is limited in both time, language and location. So the actual use of a true term that should help orient one better on Jesus — becomes a seed of scandal — unless understood and properly apprised.

You may have some scandal in your life based upon “doing the right thing” or based upon your “family of origin” or “birth nation”. Those are standard practice when we are born into a lawless world. In fact, since the devil is the prince of the power of the air — in a way — we are born trespassers in satan’s domain if we are born outside the Kingdom of God — not having Christian parents and otherwise even being born in a world that requires we travel and traverse. No person, since the fall has been born into a “peaceful” world — or else Jesus would not have said — test the household — say “Peace be upon you” and if your peace returns — let it be. But Jesus was aware we are born into a hostile world. A world that is affected by the dark bent of sin and the devil towards sin, death and destruction. Hence we have the Ten Commandments which is the most proper law. And which brings great scandal if one simply seeks to live by same. Therefore expect that being proper will cause you to be scandelized.

BEING PROPER MEANS CONSIDERING PROVISION

God has a vision. And to that vision there is a release of provision. Or those elements which make the vision work. Planning is required and efforts, but in being proper we must always consider that provision will be provided. There is no need to fret or be concerned. As being proper demands dignity and God provides for the needs of the Saints. That is not to say that people will not starve because we are seeking to “be proper” and God provides. For inversely the opposite is true — people starve not because God refused to provide — but because a foolish and selfish person got “in the way”. Or otherwise caused a delay and denial of that which God willed, albeit only for a season. For God’s will does come to pass. And yet might men and women just take action and speak truth to ensure that it does.

Because without provision the vision will not come to pass and God is no insensitive to this reality. The opposite is true as Jesus demonstrated with the fishes and loaves. God provides in an abundenace and to an overflow/excess. There is no need that God will not meet — however some of God’s solutions are not our preference. So we must learn that being proper does not mean that God’s provides how we desire or demand. At times the Bible teaches he gives an excess which flows over and pours into our laps. While at other times the Lord allows suffering from lack to grow us and utilizes poverty to keep us humble. So we must consider that in being proper we are being faithful to not compromise in the matters of integrity and maintain the faith in that process that — God does provide. Yet our “vision” of his provision must be ready and willing to adapt and overcome. No overcome as if God provides in lack — but overcome as in God provides as He sees fit that we need. Not as we always want, while many times it actually exceeds our wants and expectations. But it is in the moments of our expectations or our “vision” exceeding that which God provides that we become despondent improperly. For the provisions are not the actual source — but our relationship with God. That is the “source” and He is the “Source”. Thus, in all our ways in order to remain proper one must accept God’s provision as He sees fit to provide.

BEING PROPER MEANS KEEPING THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

Many judges will stand before the Judge of the Universe and not have a chance. Thousands upon thousands over the years from every culture — of Judges — will be brought before the Great Judge of the Universe based upon one standard. The life of Jesus. All will fall short. But then they will be judged based upon not His perfect life — albeit Jesus vindicates the righteousness of God in giving his life. But we will be judged based upon the 10 Commandments and so will every human Judge. That is the beauty. Now the Bible does teach that a “proper” judgment will be of the conscious based upon that which we understand as law. The “law of conscious” which becomes more accountable with greater knowledge. Thus, being proper means learning the Ten Commandments and keeping them. Any other “rule of man” that runs contrary to those laws will not be applied. But those commandments are the standard.

BEING PROPER MEANS RECOGNIZING DIVERSITY

While it is not often considered in the terms of being “proper” or “improper” — family of origin matters but should not in our minds be exclusionary in any regard. In fact, that appears to be one of the most divisive issues today. What “race” or ethniticity has “preference” with God. Those who do the will of God, Jesus said are his mother, sisters and brothers. But that does not mean that we dismiss our family. Rather being proper means honoring our family, as the Commandments require it, yet not being limited in our faith journey and not limiting the faith journey of others based upon family, race or ethnicity.

For Jesus was a negro. And that is written to create “shock” and then “awe” at the intentions and reality of truth found in that statement. Jesus was from Africa. At least being called out of Africa. And Jesus again was a brown man or a black man. There is no doubt that he was not white or of European descent. It should also be noted that Jesus had a man from Cyrene carry his cross with Him.

Simon is the name of the man. A true follower of God who just happened to be traveling the day Jesus was forced to carry His cross to His bodily death. Talk about clarity as to the inclusion of Africa. Jesus was negro and had a negro carry His cross with Him. For Simon was of Cyrene which is located in modern Libya. That nation borders modern Egypt there in northern Africa. Hence — Simon of Cyrene was an African. And Jesus was called out of Egypt. Thus — both Jesus and Simon of Cyrene were negros. That is not used to offend or otherwise diminish. But rather the term is used to build up the positive implications of the term — and to reset the exiling or alienating tendencies of using terms for exclusionary purposes. For at no time does the Bible teach that exclusion based upon race or ethniticy or place of origin as proper.

Rather even in the Old Testament we see the story of Ruth and Naome. A story of taking unto oneself the people of another as ones own. And that is how God wills for us by faith to journey. To be adopted into the family of God. And to accept others in their differences and diverse ways. The goal is being a “better human” one day at a time, which does not presupose any family of origin. But obedience to the commandments and specifically the call to “love”.

BEING PROPER MEANS RECOGNIZING TRIBAL ORDER

Yes, Jesus was either a brown man or a black man. And yet there are Twelve Tribes. One is not able to dogmatically affirm who belongs to what tribe — all of us being descendents of Adam & Eve — subsequently Noah and his family. But there is tribal order designed and intended by God. In fact, in the book of Ezra chapter 9 God discusses marrying within ones own tribe.

For yes — to be proper we must embrace diversity. But that does not mean to the exclusion of those we find “not diverse” or with some bizarre desire for sameness. As a matter of pragmatic theology — God likes us. And God likes us how He created us. Looking for a spouse or a friend who “looks like your tribe” — is no sin. Par for the course of some young peoples lives appears to be penance dating or marriage which involve some almost awkward fascination with “sameness” and a tribal order rejection. Granted marrying across tribes is certainly equal to marrying within one’s own “tribe” — with this context literally focusing upon likeness and similarities in appearance.

Because no person of objective taste looks down upon another for dating or marrying someone with a similar appearance. And no objective person would forbid or should forbid any two individuals in love with godly guidance to marry based upon appearance. Equally so, one should not reject the idea of accepting how God chose to create us — features and all. Liking your own soul is no sin and being comfortable in your own skin is a pre-requiste to spiritual peace.

In support of the need for one to focus upon being in a family and in effect not turning his or her back on his spiritual tribe — be mindful that some consider “knock-off” tribes exist.

So while it is most def proper to be diverse it is no less proper in the pursuit of diversity to celebrate tribal order. In fact, it is most proper to honor our uniqueness and accept how God created you. You have both a spiritual family and a true tribe — do not be ashamed of God’s plan for your life. Ultimately your soul is God’s concern and accepting the beauty of the tribal system is vital to understanding God’s redemptive plan. So be proper and shun not that tribal uniqueness is good.

BEING PROPER MEANS HAVING FAITH IN YOUR PREDETERMINED TEAMS

As an extension of tribes being predetermined by God, be ready for pre-destined “teammates” who may look like you — or may not. In fact, you should be inviting and looking for friends of the Kingdom who are of another tribe. People whose diversity in gifitings and appearance bring more value to your life and inversely you add value to his or her life.

As part of hte entertainment fix of Americans in modernity many times movies are indulged in. Some are of such great cheer and humor that it is difficult to not get “sucked” into a “good” wasted hour or more of time — watching characters act out essentially life lessons that the Saints and Bible already teach us. But the bridge through all media and modern forms of communication for the Gospel are present. Point being in one modern movie there is depicted a “good version” of a team of three and then there is this “fallen” version. The movie set the scene for a basketball game from school days to be replayed in adult years. The team that initially won was the group of three that looked like a “fallen” version. When the trio were younger they were larger and had more strength. But over time, their fallen state became more evident — and this fallen trio basketball team who originally appeared to “win” the game — appeared now in their adult years to be losing at the game of life.

The intention of the scene was to show and illustrate true joy and friendship. And in a strange way some mysterious force that implies a version of originality and fake duplication. For there is a “best version of you” and yet — there is also a version of ourselves which we “live down to”. Yes — it is not God’s will that any should perish. But ultimately your own human efforts will not grant the unction necessary to “leap” from life through death into the next life. There is no single task or team or actual work that can be accomplished which would make you “righteous” with all of humanity and ultimately before a holy God.

Just as with the team — the “good” trio that went on to marry and live regular normal lives — being joyful in “who” they are not based upon a win or a loss. And then there is the “bad” team or the “misfits” or those who just seem to not be as “together” and otherwise do not appear with the same charisma. This team — reflects an inferior version of the same characters — at least with regards to the game of basketball and life. All three look very similar — and so it is in the real world.

There is a best or most proper version of yourself. To receive the greater pleasures of life — this version of yourself must be “discovered”. Of course, to discover such one must believe that God has a plan. That the design of God is “wonderful” and that we are “fearfully” made. Not that we are to have an unhealth fear — but we should and must desire to be “proper” for God is holy. And every opportunity or situation in which we can be more like God and bring more order, offer more charisma from God or otherwise act in accordance with the teachings of the Scripture — those moments of “being proper” are predestined. And there are “works” or poetic service of others that we are called to fulfill so says Ephesians 2:8–9. So since God has prepared plans for us to “walk in them” and those plans are like our life’s poem — we should be anticipating “new teammates” each day. That is a point of prudence in the journey to be proper and orderly.

BEING PROPER MEANS BEING HONEST WITH ONESELF

Most of our conflict externally is due to internal disorder — while some is due to projection of the internal conflict of others. Very little has to do with the honest of another person — but that does occur. There are false witnesses. But from my study the most common hurdle to ones progression and growth is a lack of introspection and the lack of opportunity for an actual “honest” examination of the conscious. That is not to impute evasion. But rather to confirm that when people examine their ways — if the framework is crooked — then the examination will not be “honest” to the objective standards God intended. Meaning that one may be “honest” in deducing that 2+2 = 4 and therefore relying upon that truth that he or she has only $4 dollars because of the reality of mathematics and currency. But one may also be taught that 2+2 = 5. And in that situation an examination of the conscious as to how close he or she can come to accepting that reality that 2+2 = 5 and how that has impacted ones life — such an examination would be futile and counter-productive.

Therefore in being proper one must be honest with oneself. And do so based upon real and objective standards. If a young lady is depressed because she lost her job a few weeks after having an abortion. Would it be proper to have her examine her conscious about how well she performed on the job before termination or lay off? Perhaps for a while. But the standard of “life” as grave and of preeminent importance should also not be overlooked. For that young lady may be coached to “just get better” and do things more precisely — with no encouragement to consider what the abortion has done to her soul. Hence — she would be taking an “honest” assessment as much as it depended on her — but not being doing so according to a proper framework.

And so that often is the case. Many consider how much money he or she did or did not make. The “position” or “title” — and yet all the while — avoid an examination of conscious based upon the Ten Commandments. As that is the case, it should be noted that such a person is not suffering per se from a lack of willingness to “be proper”. But a lack of proper guidance as to what standards to apply and the mechanics of that process. Thus, in being proper — be sure you chose the appropriate teams and guides. For being proper is a matter of process and is possible. Those who keep God’s laws are proper before Him when the pardon of the Lord is applied. Therefore, the process should not be abandoned to “feel proper” and to otherwise experience “dignity” and even share in God’s glory when we act properly. But the very pride of life in how well our efforts looked or how well we performed compared to another — that is the actual framework of an endless cycle. A cycle of double standards and moving goal posts. And let it never be. Rather to be proper take the Ten Commandments and get ready to do a deep ponder specifically of the prohibition of coveting. Which is the last — and yet true “catch all”.

BEING PROPER MEANS BEING HAPPY FOR OTHERS

Coveting is being jealous or unhappy that someone else has something we desire. And is the essence of the term “hater”. When someone bears or has “hate” in his or her heart — over another possession something he or she want (consciously or unconscoulsly) that is actual mortal sin. Very tricky if one does not properly apply the framework. For the Pharisees were full of pride and greed and coveteousness. An ongoing untamable desire to have what someone else possesses and is otherwise legally entitled to. That leads to stealing and false witness which seems to be why God placed it last on the list — as a catch all reminder. For adultery itself is the act of covething another persons spouse and then acting upon that desire. So in essence understanding how to truly “be happy” for someone when he or she experiences God’s plessings if vital.

Because also often wanting a tangible object lets say that is at a store or at a dealership or otherwise “for sale” creates a longing and an expectation. That expectation is neither good nor immoral — if kept in the proper context. Are you able to “be happy” in your relationship with the Lord — without the possession you have in mind. If so — it is likely safe ground to pray about procuring that tangible item — that chattel. But if you are not happy to begin with in your relationship with God — obtaining a new car, new house, new whatever will simply create more let down. It is similar to the crest of a wave. The higher the wave — the greater force with which the water crashes.

So coveting an object that one works to obtain, then obtains and utilizes for the purposes desire — will actually create an even deeper pit in the soul. A feeling of a greater gap between God, not a closed gap, will occur. For the person who covets actually exchanges his or her soul for the object. An object that may bring pleasure or an object that may bring attention and hence the pride of life. Regardless, Jesus made it very clear — those are idols. Wherein we focus on the matters of this world — and not first the matter of the soul and who judges the soul. Therefore to be proper you must learn to be happy for others in their success and also happy with yourself even when it seems that the greedy and otherwise selfish ones are prevailing.

Because you do not need and will not venture from the path if one understands the mechanics of the faith with regards to baptism and then the receiving of the Eucharist. That Holy formula will always lead to a great detachment from the world an its possessions but for practical and ministry purposes. Sprinked with the greater pleasure of the faith — for the one who possesses without coveting or being greedy is a true owner. Free of any fear of losing the objects or property — and able to enjoy their intended purposes. So to be proper one must be happy in his or her relationship with God notwithstanding our possessions or the possessions of others.

BEING PROPER MEANS AFFIRMING IDENTITIES

Years ago a dear friend of mine’s wife commented that America’s do not appear to “know their roles”. She was referring to specifically the disconnect from the culture of the 1950–1980 into the domestic turmoil that America has inherited. And much of her statement is based upon the reality that to be proper one must know his or her own identity and be willing to affirm the identity of others. Their true identity that is.

Recently I read: “A poor fool can sit on a throne and he is still a fool. And a king can wear rags and he is still a king.” That essence of identity is what must be embraced. If one believes he or she is a “king” the entire demenaor and vision for life — contrasts that of one who believes himself to be a fool which would only have been spoken by another. For no one is born with a fools identity. Rather, the Bible teaches that mankind are the apex of creation. Granted God has a sovereign election process — but our free will remains to chose God’s plan which is Jesus as King, rather than our own — which is us as a fool pretending we are the king. Yes. Christians are co-heirs — and otherwise will inherit the kingdom and thus we are kings and queens. Jesus is the King of Kings. And Mary is the Queen of Queens. King and Queen of the Universe, if you will. And Jesus tells us to call no one purposeless or an “idiot”. That is because while one as a human may make a mistake and take an action that is foolish. He or she is not because of that action or any other factor — without divine purpose. And that is what we all seek — the ongoing flow of plan, purpose, provision and proactivation.

BEING PROPER MEANS EMBRACING DIVINE PURPOSES

Many wander lost in this world without “purpose”. They act as if their life is a series of free will choices that culminate in hopeful experience of laughter, love and peace. But the reality is — the lesser pleasure are what one experiences if he or she does not discovery their purpose. Of course, many spiritual leaders, motivational speakers, and bosses have sought to instruct and infuse purpose. However, our ultimate purpose is to glorify God and enjoy relationship with God. Thus to truly be proper you must embrace that you have a purpose and God’s purpose for your life involves other people. Breathing life into those around us is crucial — but doing so with proper focus. For not everyone who claims to be a Christian or of good will is truly dignified and worthy of being considered “proper”.

In fact the opposite pattern is often brought to the forefront. A pattern of dressing up that which is improper to make it appear proper. Hence the saying — a fool may sit on a throne — but he does not then become king. And a king may be in rags for he remains a king. For there are many that live lives of folly. The word in modern context of “fun” stems from folly and otherwise was considered to be a negative implication. But “fun” today is the term use often when describing education and other actual necessary training. Yes — it is okay to laugh and should actually be considered medicine for the soul — thus necessary daily. Yes — it is okay to “enjoy” life as that appears to be what God has called us to. An infusion of joy which is ongoing. Scripturally speaking it is the joy that is our strength.

But fools pretend one situation is true while it is not. A life of folly is neglecting duties and responsibility while pretending in a fake glee that it does not matter. Almost as if “someone else will take out the slack”. And that is what often happens when one acts foolishly and presents something improper as proper. There is a disconnect and an effect upon others which is costly. Thus, to be proper one must enjoy the process. And embrace purpose as divine and available. There must be a discovery of what worship truly is — then action and self-exploration, so it seems.

BEING PROPER MEANS WORSHIPPING PROPERLY

Without sacrifice — there is no worship. So says the Bible. And some teach, which I have come to understand the perspective of, that without a literal “sacrifice” like the Lord’s Supper or Eucharist — it is not worship. Rather it may be “worship” music or an act of prayer or otherwise religious activity — but without an offering up to God — the supporting efforts do not cause it to become worship. That appears rather strict in scrutiny. But it appears true at least to the extent that if one is to be truly proper and recognize the conditions God offers — returning to God something that cost is worship.

Much of what cults do and other hyper seeker friendly movements do is posture people for a works based form of false worship. The idea is learning means we are better positioned to “act” on God’s behalf — so one gets discipled. Singing is a way to strengthen our faith, develop our cords and unites us with others — but it is not worship just because God is mentioned. And can in fact become a vain exercise of meeting with others who agree as to the concept of God and agree as to certain tenants — but in kind are not actually offering up a true sacrifice. Yes — time is expended. Yes — efforts are expended in focus. But the expectation of the purported “worshiper” is something in return from God — an alignment or a blessing or “favor”. That is not worship but rather quib pro quo Christianity.

BEING PROPER MEANS EMBRACING LONGSUFFERING

No suffering. Or quickened, relieved suffering. That is our preference, naturally. But the reality is that we live in a world of real suffering which is inescapable. Thus, how we suffering is what determins whether we are being proper in our response. Internally therefore — prepare yourself for being proper by preparing for longsuffering — with others. That is the key.

Jesus suffered alone to some extent, yet Mary and John were at the Cross. And others encouraged Him in carrying the cross. So expect to suffer. Expect for it to be longsuffering. And expect that suffering is not an indication that one has acted improperly. Rather we often suffer because we are proper and those who seek to oppress or otherwise the infidels that do not keep the Ten Commandments — force suffering which is an act of oppressing — many times because of a sense of lack. Point being if you are suffering for the sake of righteousness — that is expected and should be embraced for the longhaul with a team.

BEING PROPER MEANS TRUSTING GOD’S FORM OF PROVISIONS

The very presence of the Lord in the person of the Holy Spirit is a provision. It is a grace. For where the Holy Spirit is there is freedom. And yet God also provides in manners and forms in which we are not accustomed or do not expect. Imagine the shock of Mary of Magdalene who visited the empty tomb of Jesus. She found no body. No material object there — perhaps she saw the Shroud of Turin. It is believed so which also bears witness of the need to appreciate minimalism or living without excess. As Jesus Himself had no where to “lay his head” depending upon others for his provisions. And when He left this earth — having died, been buried and resurrected. His only possession He folded to indicate how orderly God actually is in nature.

The Lord actually also appeared in the form of a gardner. That is a Biblical fact. Mary seeking to find Jesus’ body was so convinced that this “Man” the Gardner was working in an area under which he had charge — and the “Gardner” was working with a knowledge sufficient to know where the Body of Jesus had been placed. Hence — Jesus was taking such a different form for a sufficient time period that Mary was not able to recognize him and was convinced that he had charge over Jesus’ Body. When in fact the Gardner in disguise was Jesus. Hence — He first provided in a way that challenged her faith. He remained “Proper” in the sense that Jesus was actually gardening — after His resurrection. Or so Mary believed. And then He blessed her.

The same situation of form being necessary as a way for God to provide, but not always as we would expect can be seen when Jesus also appears on the road to Emmaus. There is no doubt that He walks miles appears as a journeyman. Someone not local and someone who had intimate knowledge of the Hebrew Scriptures. So Jesus not only provided the provision of a Holy Interpretation, He was sufficient in His delivery of the subject matter and His presence provided a suffucinet peace that the disciples listned to His teaching. Even inviting Him to eat with them without trade — for no provision. His very presence pushed out sufficient holy grace that the disciples, without recognizing Him, recognized that God had in some way predetremiend their meeting and orchestrated an opportunity to share bread. Little did the disciples know that Jesus had already fed them with the Word and His presence — taking a different form and expounding upon the mysteries which the disciples were blinded from understanding. Jesus then “breaks the bread” the Bible says — and in that moment — His natural state form of which the disciples were accostme appeared. That is having faith and being proper in trusting that God’s provisions may not appear as we would expect — but certainly are sufficient.

BEING PROPER MEANS BEING BAPTIZED

Baptism is admission into the Kingdom of God — period. Some may say — I am submitted to the Law. Perhaps Jesus will grant access to the Kingdom of God based upon that one’s own righteousness — but same is not likely. Perhaps the one who is “Muslim” thus not being an Infidel is righteous or at least among mankind having no violation of the Ten Commandments as did Job and others in the Old Testament who were considered in right standing among mankind. But in our “dispensation” if this saving knowledge is available — there is no doubt — Baptism is the receiving of the election that you were chosen for the Kingdom of God.

The very action of receiving this great grace which is recognized as a sacrament is the faith response. So in order to be proper — one must recognize that a deadness exists in his or her flesh. That there is a need for spiritual intervention and there should be a predisposition of faith that the “Holy Waters” of Baptism are that — blessed by God — as water itself is a Gift from God. Yet over and above a general blessing which the world receives as common grace — partaking of the receipt of this gift — Water Baptism by Holy Water — is an assertion of faith in God’s power to infuse “saving” or better understood “pardoning” grace.

Therefore to be proper one must receive the sacrament of Baptism.

BEING PROPER MEANS BELIEVING IN THE EUCHARIST

Many assert some form of elitism or otherwise some higher strength or power. Many use God to assert their own human spiritual energy and will to advance agendas of their own believing it to be in good faith but actually done in blindness spiritually. Jesus called these people the “blind leading the blind”. For they literally were blind to the righteousness and entirety of Jesus’ divinity — the very Son of God standing before them. Today we see the same pattern among those who take offense at the suggestion that their sinfulness and spiritual sickness is so dark and dead that he or she would need an infusion of literal, Sacred Bread. The very offense of the matter is their own sin — and also the fleshly mind which considers itself “dead” in a way — deep within the thinking of the carnal mind.

That same inner craving is also curved and otherwise fed which closes the “gap” and creates a progressive conversion that is not merely spiritual but is received as a tangible grace — the Sacred Heart. Does that offend you to be considered ‘proper’? To say that you are “dead” and not only should — but must — you must — in order to be proper a human must eat of the Eucharist. That is the sole source of tangible life which remains for eternity albeit the same serves as “food for the journey” spiritually in this life. That is not to say that receiving the Eucharist while living in a life of sin would allow one to remain “proper” in standing with God. Rather the peculiar objectivity of the Eucharist is that the Substance is Holy — being Jesus in the Flesh — a Sacred Lion’s Heart & Blood — thus — when one receives the Eucharist while in a state of mortal sin — the person is eating Judgement. The Eucharist will bear witness of the Divinity of Jesus and by natural progression lead to a desire for “keeping” the Holy Laws of Jesus — and living out the virtues. That very focus is actual and remains since the institution of the Eucharist as the most proper orientation.

Otherwise — one is “lost”. Where the preacher, pastor, bishop — politician or otherwise guru — whoever he or she may be — if the Eucharist is not the center of his or her natural law orientation — that person is disoriented spiritually and yet if he or she proceeds in seeking the truth — the person should be subsumed into the Catholic Church. For God is no respecter of persons and it is not His will that any should perish — therefore if a person “wants” to be saved — God shall not forbid that person such a common grace opportunity. Hence — hell exists but so does purgatory. There are methods in this life to avoid purgatory — manners in which we remain committed that heaven is experienced in this life when we participate in the Mass — then by extension in our practice of the Seven Sacraments. So being proper means receiving and also orienting on the centrality of the Eucharist. Be proper — believe in the Sacred Heart of Jesus.

CONCLUSION

Jesus likely spent time in the Middle East, north Africa, and likely Asia — given many speculate that during the “missing years”, approximately a “gap” of eighteen (18), He went to India. There is no certainty on that claim historically or dogmatically taught by the Church. But the point is Jesus was not merely a boy who grew into a man that never left a village in the middle east. He was and is the Messiah for all people. He by way of the very Bible that many accept — appeared in different ‘forms’. And without a doubt He was “called out of Egypt”.

Therefore, in order to truly understand the intentions of God in being so very interested in a personal relationship with us — it does appear that God uses the difference in our own appearances to force us to be more “tribal” and “Kingdom” oriented. There is zero doubt that Jesus was not European. He was not a “white man” as some would have one to think. And yet His love for all remains steadfast and true. For that which is in the heart of man is the matters God is concerned with. So be proper — be kind — be holy — be happy — and be a follower of the Jesus of the Bible. One who died, rose again, sent His Holy Spirit and feeds us with a Sacred Bread.

____________________________________________________

Favilla Proprius — Be Proper

____________________________________________________

POLITICAL DISCLAIMER

Hey — so given people “get offended” by putting up shadow fences often based on pretexts and misunderstandings consider first God’s call to relate the Gospel to everyone willing to consider. And note it seemed wise to include an Offense Disclaimer wherein the book’s intentions already expounded upon are restated, yet with this caveat. Writing and saying that “Jesus was a Negro” is not a matter of supporting or opposing any political party, any political movement, any Christian denomination or otherwise. If anything this is “pro-black” and it disclaims any possibility that Jesus was European “white” for clearly He was not.

The book title is intended to stir an examination of one’s own identity and the all too common error of imputing race, ethnicity or family of origin to terms objectively not reduced or intended to be contextually limited to such subjective considerations. Rather, as a “Brit” finds no offense or race imputed in being called such — the official and proper reading of the term Negro is one of class, respect, literal historical geographical record anchoring of a specific region particular primarily to northern Africa and utilized as a term by European governments. The term has clearly a negative connotation — if intended which some small minded people of all races and ethnicities refuse to resist — but same has zero negative intention by inclusion in this book and same is neither offered in irreverence.

Rather for thoughtful consideration that skin tone, proportion of body parts comparatively speaking, regions of birth, family of origin, ethnic presuppositions have all impacted our faith perspectives individually. Yes — Jesus was a “brown” or “black” man as one surveying records in modernity would likely categorize the most famous man in human history. Dogmatically true as well — Jesus was called out of “Egypt” and hence — Jesus was a Negro — like it or not. Consider the term for the sake of a “step” towards God — however you best understand and orient towards an all loving, redemptive suffering Servant once crucified and risen — who claimed Himself to be God’s Son. For the flesh profits nothing, so let not your own gray matter be a hurdle to this basic challenge to “Be Proper”.

CONCLUSION

Perhaps the consideration of one’s own predisposition to “judge” the book by its title will help you on your journey to eternal peace with God. Because whatever the Jesus of the Bible looks like — for certain He loves you!

Be Happy! +Brother Trent.

“The first end I propose in our daily work is to do the will of God; secondly, to do it in the manner he wills it; and thirdly to do it because it is God’s will.” -St. Elizabeth Ann Seton

____________________________________________________

For practical teachings of a spiritual “Next Step” offered consider the Series. The format as apologetic/defensive of the faith, pragmatic in theological guided progressions and organized based upon subject matter consider the Favilla Series for yourself or a loved one:

Amara Favilla ~ Being Love.

Proprius Favilla ~ Being Proper.

Misericordia Favilla ~ Being Mercy.

Pax Favilla ~ Being Peace.

Spes Favilla ~ Being Hope.

Medicus Favilla ~ Being Whole.

Legis Favilla ~ Being Righteous.

Publicus Favilla ~ Being Common.