Revealed: the TRUTH behind the moon landing and 9/11 conspiracies
University of Cambridge
20054

The 9/11 thing though…

…the films I watched, though, didn’t provide a theory, only a demand to have reasonable questions answered…

Like how the hole on the Pentagon was not only clearly too small for an airliner to fit through, but the obvious shortage of debris…

How the structure of the towers was a stiff central concrete and steel spine, holding the inside edge of floors, while a thin steel shell on the outside held that edge of the floors, so the damage caused could not have caused a symmetrical collapse… reports of secondary explosions, that we all watched in real time, where no explosive materials were stored on site…

While some did develop theories of who and how such occurrences could be explained, convincing answers to those questions were not provided, but instead were immediately met with the dismissal “conspiracy theory”… so as you note, led to more theories being born, or distributed as distraction

Kind of makes the official explanation a conspiracy theory

A single golf clap? Or a long standing ovation?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.