They’s some things wrong with the ass umptions
If we must abide by our tribal nature, and wish to have a pleasant and sustainable future…
..perhaps it would be more useful to establish a global tribe of humans
Since a superficial attachment can establish a tribe, common ownership of the foundation of our global economy will work…
…while also creating sufficient money to support a functional and inclusive global economic system, and providing each with a quantum of secure capital with a residual income
This can be accomplished with a rather small change, and enable all those cooperative measures that are so appealing
The failing then is expecting to affect a more cooperative nature among humans without establishing an inclusive structure
The time factor they note, the urgency, is not served by expecting a major perspective change from all of humanity, with no basic structural change
When each is allowed to claim their Share and actually sign their social contract, we will each be enfranchised in a planetary society, with common goals, and clear interdependence
With global tribe established, common needs and goals may be effectively pursued
Accepting the claim that no “one size fits all” solution is viable, I will submit that global economic enfranchisement is not a solution, but the ultimate enabler of solutions, so, one size fits each
Accepting that the people do not control things, so we should retreat from all the advances we have made over centuries of prying rights and powers from the kings, is folly…
..particularly when our individual sovereignty is at hand
Global economic enfranchisement is a reasonable and valid structure, as well as a valid and useful experiment..
…and thanks so much for your kind indulgence
