stephenstillwell
Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read

You are not considering the point

…and not being specific, or accurate

For one, although there is a finite amount of stone on the planet, we are not going to run out…

..or labor

Past excesses do not guarantee future excesses, and a more efficient provision of basic needs reduces excess, stress, and waste

The establishment of global economic enfranchisement enables investment in the antidotes, while neutralizing the counterproductive demands of those with extreme wealth, by making that wealth irrelevant…

..because the work people really want to do, to improve our existence and environment, will be funded with per capita full faith and credit

Global economic enfranchisement establishes each as sovereign individuals, and codifies social contracts… there is a profound psychological effect to consider

Initial establishment at the noted values will provide each with about $20/month based on the existing level of global sovereign debt…

..and with the poor leading the way, less consumptive practices will be revealed..

..as the cost of basic needs is reduced, and debt is increased along with the basic income, your vision of a more simple existence is enabled

This also creates a functional global debt limit, that is a per capita function, as opposed to the absurdly open ended existing structure, democratizes the process of money creation…

..also makes “per capita” a significantly more useful and valid metric, by creating a non-zero minimum per capita capital ownership

Your arguments are based on a world without global economic enfranchisement, so do not consider or address the suggested change

    stephenstillwell

    Written by

    I want everyone to get paid