This story is unavailable.

One thing that leaps out is the one-sided arbitration clause. Trump can go to court but can make a volunteer submit to arbitration. Might be unconscionable. Also seems like there should be some parity. If the volunteer can’t disparage Trump, he shouldn’t be allowed to disparage the volunteer; something Trump would probably be incapable of avoiding if he decided he didn’t like someone. Under Trump’s contract, he could say someone is a horrible lying human being who did horrible disgusting things, but if the person responded that Trump was lying, Trump could sue him. Shows an almost paranoid thin skin; they guy can dish it out but can’t take it.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.