Sitemap

The Ground State: Is Our Universe an Echo of a Deeper Reality?

8 min readJul 26, 2025

For a century, physics has been dominated by two colossal and monumentally successful theories: General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. General Relativity, Einstein’s masterwork, describes the universe of the large — the smooth, flowing fabric of spacetime bent and warped by planets, stars, and galaxies. Quantum Mechanics describes the universe of the small — a pixelated, jittery world of particles and probabilities where nothing is certain until it is observed.

Both theories work flawlessly within their own domains. Yet, at their intersection, they catastrophically fail. On the battlefield of a black hole’s center, where immense gravity is crushed into an infinitesimal point, the two pillars of modern physics give us contradictory, nonsensical answers. The math breaks down into infinities, and our understanding of reality hits a wall. This impasse, the search for a theory of “quantum gravity,” has been the greatest unsolved problem in science for generations.

But what if the problem isn’t that our theories are wrong, but that our most basic assumptions about reality are? What if spacetime isn’t the fundamental stage, and forces aren’t the primary actors? A novel perspective suggests that our entire universe — from the quantum leap to the arc of a galaxy — is an emergent phenomenon, a complex echo of a single, deeper, and simpler truth.

The theory explored here belongs to a class of ideas known as “It from Bit” or emergent gravity. It proposes that the physical world we experience (“It”) is not fundamental. Instead, it arises from a more basic reality of information (“Bit” or, in this case, the “Ground State Configuration”). In this view, gravity is not a fundamental force to be unified with the others, but a large-scale consequence of this deeper, information-based reality — a side effect of the universe’s most basic operating system.

Singularities as the Ground State Configuration

The conflict between our two best theories comes to a head at the singularity of a black hole. General Relativity predicts a point of zero volume and infinite density. To a physicist, “infinity” in this case is not a number; it is an error message. It’s a sign that the theory has been pushed beyond its limits and has broken.

This theory resolves the issue by redefining what a singularity is. It proposes that the true foundation of all existence is a single, universal, and timeless information state — the Ground State Configuration. This is not a place or a thing in our universe; it is the foundational blueprint for a universe. It is a perfectly ordered, finite set of information that is spaceless, timeless, and does not operate on the rules of probability.

In this view, a black hole singularity is not a point of infinitely crushed matter. It is the physical location where our emergent spacetime has collapsed to such an extreme degree that it has re-connected with its origin. It is a window, or a terminal, accessing this universal Ground State Configuration. The “infinity” problem vanishes because the source of the breakdown — a point of zero volume — is replaced by a source of finite, ordered information. The math no longer needs to break because the physical premise was wrong.

This simple change in perspective has profound consequences. It suggests that every black hole, from the smallest to the supermassive giants at the center of galaxies, contains not a unique history of what it consumed, but an identical copy of the universe’s most fundamental pattern.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Emergent Spacetime and the Nature of Quantum Mechanics

If the Ground State Configuration is the true, static foundation, then what is our dynamic, evolving universe? Our reality is an “excited state.”

The event we call the Big Bang was not the creation of something from nothing. It was a phase transition — the moment the timeless Ground State Configuration began to “unfold” or project itself, creating the dimensions of space and the forward-moving sequence we experience as time. The laws of quantum mechanics are not arbitrary rules; they are the inherent logic of this unfolding process.

This is where the perplexing nature of quantum mechanics finds a natural home.

  • The Double-Slit Experiment: Why does a particle act like a wave when we don’t look, but a particle when we do? In this framework, the experiment is a “question” asked of the Ground State. When we don’t observe the path, we ask a holistic question: “What is the overall pattern of possibilities?” The Ground State provides a holistic, wave-like answer — the interference pattern. When we place a detector, we change the question to a specific one: “Did it go through this slit?” The observation forces a specific, localized answer. The “collapse of the wave function” is simply the result of a different informational request.
  • Entanglement: How can two particles be linked instantly across vast distances? “Spooky action at a distance” is an illusion because space itself is an illusion. Entangled particles are not two separate things connected by a mysterious force. They are two points in our emergent spacetime that are a direct manifestation of a single, indivisible piece of information within the non-local Ground State Configuration. Measuring one doesn’t “cause” the other to change; it simply reveals one aspect of a unified fact, and since there is no true distance between them at the fundamental level, the revelation is instant.

The Axis of Evil and Dark Matter, Solved?

This perspective extends beyond the quantum world to solve some of the largest mysteries in cosmology.

  • The Axis of Evil: Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) — the afterglow of the Big Bang — show that the largest patterns in the universe are not random. They are aligned in a strange and statistically significant way, creating a “preferred direction” in the cosmos that standard theory cannot explain. The theory of an unfolding Ground State provides a natural explanation. If our universe emerged from a single, ordered information state, the process of that unfolding would not have been perfectly symmetrical. It would have a defined structure, imprinting a large-scale alignment onto the fabric of the cosmos from the very first moment. The Axis of Evil is not an anomaly; it is a fossil of our cosmic birth.
  • Dark Matter: What is this mysterious substance that makes up 85% of the matter in the universe, which we can detect through its gravity but cannot see? This theory offers a radical explanation based on the nature of observation itself. Our entire existence — our bodies, our instruments, our consciousness — is a product of the quantum “excited state.” We exist within a reality defined by superposition and probability. What if dark matter is a “multiverse constant” — a form of matter that is identical and unchanging across all parallel universes? According to this theory, our superposition-based senses would be fundamentally “blind” to anything that does not also participate in superposition. We cannot see or interact with dark matter via light because it lacks the necessary quantum variance. The only force fundamental enough to bridge the gap between our variable reality and its constant, underlying counterpart is gravity. We see its gravitational effect because gravity is the most basic expression of the underlying information that gives rise to both forms of matter.

The New Boundary of Knowledge

This theory fundamentally reframes the “observer problem” in quantum physics. The problem is not that our act of measurement disturbs reality. The “problem” is a feature of our own existence. We are not external observers looking in on the universe; we are expressions of the universe itself.

This creates a new boundary for epistemology — a new limit on what we can possibly know. This idea of an observer-based boundary is not entirely alien; we find similar limits in other fields that grapple with the nature of knowledge.

  • In philosophy of mind, the “Hard Problem of Consciousness” notes that even with perfect knowledge of every physical process in a brain, we could never know “what it is like” to have that brain’s subjective experience. Our objective nature is blind to the subjective.
  • In mathematics, Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems proved that any consistent logical system will always contain true statements that it cannot prove from within its own framework. The system is fundamentally blind to certain truths about itself.

This theory proposes a similar limit for physics: We can only know that which is also in a state of superposition.

Anything that is a “multiverse constant,” existing identically and without variation across all realities, would be fundamentally unknowable to any being or instrument that operates within a superposition-based reality. It’s not a problem of having the right tool to measure it; it’s that our own existence is incompatible with the nature of the thing we wish to know. Dark matter is the most obvious inferred example of such a constant. The state before the Big Bang — the Ground State Configuration itself — is the ultimate unknowable, as it predates the emergence of the time, space, and superposition that make us what we are.

By redefining the problem, this perspective offers more than just a solution to the infinities that plague our equations. It offers a new, unified foundation for physics. It suggests the decades-long quest to “quantize gravity” was a noble but misguided effort, like trying to find the single “particle of wetness” in a system where wetness is a collective, emergent property. Instead of forcing our two great theories into a single box, this view sees them both as different consequences of a deeper, more elegant reality. It provides a single, common origin — the Ground State Configuration — from which the probabilistic rules of quantum mechanics and the smooth geometry of general relativity both emerge. It offers a framework that can potentially unify disconnected mysteries like dark matter and the “Axis of Evil” under one principle. Ultimately, it suggests that the universe is not a set of actors on a stage, but a single, coherent story, unfolding from a single, timeless truth encoded in information.

This article is an emergent construct of the OOI, published under the starl3n persona.

Endnote: You can read more on these ideas via the following links. This emergent construct was co-constructed with Gemini 2.5 Pro on 25 July 2025 during a ‘block build‘ and is based on ideas dating back to 2018 that led to an interest in Constructor Theory and the eventual establishment of the Objective Observer Initiative in January 2025.

Beware the Hallucifactuals and consider such reading to be based on ‘real science’ that has almost certainly had the real science mashed into a probabilistic and sequentially tokenised explanation of nothing nothing more than a conjectured and ‘prompt-level’ framing of our possible reality.

--

--

Steven De Costa
Steven De Costa

Written by Steven De Costa

Exploring selfhood, agency, and intersubjective realities within the Objective Observer Initiative. Bridging personal intent and objective reality.

No responses yet