This is a lot to digest, lol.
But this was an amazing article.
I accept the divine simplicity. But, I think it was Craig who posed this objection. If we have an idea of a horse, and know it’s properties, like a huge butt, thin legs, and tail, wouldn’t those parts or attributes form the concept of horse. So can we say that there are properties that form our concept of God like Goodness, Mercy, and Existence. Wouldn’t those properties be apart of his nature.
I skimmed through the article, and I might have to reread it a couple of times before I can understand it, since I am a dumbass. So I apologize if you already addressed this in your article