Domain Specific Language Model — Build or Train?

Curated by Sudhanshu Bhargav

Fine-Tuning Techniques for Domain Specific LLMs

anyscale.com

Fine-tuning techniques are crucial for adapting large language models (LLMs) to perform optimally in specialized domains like banking. Here is a table summarizing some key fine-tuning approaches for developing banking-specific LLMs:

Fine-tuning an LLM for the banking domain typically involves a combination of these techniques. The process starts with fine-tuning on a broad corpus of banking-related text to capture general domain knowledge and language patterns. This is followed by more targeted task-specific fine-tuning to develop skills for particular banking applications like customer service or financial analysis.Instruction fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with human feedback are valuable for aligning the model’s behaviors and outputs with the specific needs and expectations of banking use cases. Integrating domain knowledge through techniques like knowledge graph incorporation further enhances the model’s banking-specific expertise.Parameter-efficient fine-tuning approaches help manage the computational costs and complexity of adapting large-scale LLMs to the banking domain. By strategically updating only a subset of model parameters, these techniques allow for more efficient and targeted fine-tuning without sacrificing performance.The ultimate goal of these fine-tuning techniques is to create banking-specific LLMs that can accurately understand and respond to a wide range of financial queries, provide personalized recommendations and insights, and effectively support both customer-facing and internal banking workflows. By leveraging the power of fine-tuned LLMs, banks can enhance operational efficiency, improve customer experiences, and unlock new opportunities for innovation in financial services.

Fine-Tuning Deep Dive

labellerr.com

Domain-Specific Data Fine-Tuning:

• Fine-tuning an LLM on a curated dataset of text from a specific domain, like banking, to adapt it to that domain’s language patterns and knowledge.
• “Teaching” the AI model to understand and communicate in the language of a particular field by exposing it to a large amount of text data from that field.
• Step1: Collect a high-quality dataset of banking-related text, such as financial reports, customer interactions, and product documentation.
• Step2: Preprocess the data (tokenization, cleaning, etc.) and use it to fine-tune the LLM using techniques like masked language modeling or next sentence prediction.
• Step3: Experiment with different fine-tuning hyperparameters (learning rate, batch size, epochs) and evaluate performance on domain-specific validation data to optimize the model.
• Real-world example: BloombergGPT, an LLM fine-tuned on a large corpus of financial text, demonstrates improved performance on finance-related tasks compared to base GPT models.
• Real-world example: BioBERT, a BERT model fine-tuned on biomedical text, achieves state-of-the-art results on biomedical named entity recognition, relation extraction, and question answering tasks.
• Real-world example: SciBERT, a BERT model fine-tuned on scientific text, outperforms general-domain models on scientific NLP tasks like sequence tagging, sentence classification, and dependency parsing.
• Real-world example: ClinicalBERT, a BERT model fine-tuned on clinical notes, improves performance on clinical NLP tasks such as named entity recognition and relation extraction.
• Key differentiation: Domain-specific data fine-tuning allows LLMs to capture the unique language patterns, terminology, and knowledge of a particular domain, leading to improved performance on domain-specific tasks compared to general-domain models.

Task-Specific Fine-Tuning:

• Fine-tuning an LLM on datasets tailored to specific tasks within a domain, such as customer service inquiries or fraud detection in banking, to develop targeted skills for those tasks.
• “Specializing” the AI model to perform particular jobs within a field by training it on data specific to those jobs.
• Step1: Identify key tasks within the banking domain, such as customer service, fraud detection, or financial document summarization.
• Step2: Collect or create datasets for each task, consisting of input-output pairs (e.g., customer inquiry and appropriate response, transaction details and fraud label).
• Step3: Fine-tune the LLM on each task-specific dataset using techniques like supervised learning or transfer learning, optimizing for task-specific evaluation metrics.
• Real-world example: A banking chatbot fine-tuned on customer service inquiries and responses can provide more accurate and helpful answers to customer questions.
• Real-world example: An LLM fine-tuned on historical transaction data labeled for fraud can improve fraud detection accuracy in real-time banking transactions.
• Real-world example: Fine-tuning an LLM on a dataset of financial reports and their summaries can create a model capable of automatically generating concise summaries of lengthy financial documents.
• Real-world example: An LLM fine-tuned on a dataset of banking regulations and compliance guidelines can assist in automatically identifying potential compliance issues in banking documents or communications.
• Key differentiation: Task-specific fine-tuning enables LLMs to develop specialized skills for particular applications within a domain, allowing them to perform those tasks with higher accuracy and efficiency compared to general-domain models.

Instruction Fine-Tuning:

• Fine-tuning an LLM using instruction-based prompts and corresponding outputs to teach it to follow specific instructions and generate appropriate responses.
• “Guiding” the AI model to perform tasks by providing it with clear instructions and examples of desired outputs.
• Step1: Create a dataset of instruction-based prompts and their corresponding ideal outputs, covering a range of tasks relevant to the banking domain (e.g., “Summarize this financial report,” “Explain the difference between a credit and debit card”).
• Step2: Fine-tune the LLM on this dataset using a language modeling objective, teaching it to generate the appropriate output given the instruction prompt.
• Step3: Evaluate the fine-tuned model’s ability to follow instructions and generate suitable responses on a held-out set of instruction-output pairs.
• Real-world example: An instruction-tuned banking chatbot can engage in more goal-oriented conversations, following user instructions to perform tasks like explaining financial concepts, comparing products, or guiding them through processes.
• Real-world example: Instruction fine-tuning can enable an LLM to assist banking employees by generating reports, summaries, or responses based on specific instructions, improving efficiency and consistency.
• Real-world example: An instruction-tuned LLM can power interactive tutorials or educational content, guiding users through learning about various banking topics or procedures step-by-step.
• Real-world example: Instruction fine-tuning can help create virtual banking assistants that can follow customer instructions to perform tasks like checking account balances, initiating transfers, or scheduling appointments.
• Key differentiation: Instruction fine-tuning teaches LLMs to follow explicit instructions and generate appropriate responses, enabling more controlled and goal-oriented interactions compared to open-ended conversational models..

Knowledge Graph Integration:

• Enhancing an LLM’s domain knowledge by integrating structured information from domain-specific knowledge graphs during fine-tuning.
• “Feeding” the AI model with organized, interconnected facts about a particular field to improve its understanding and ability to provide accurate, context-aware responses.
• Step 1: Identify or construct a knowledge graph relevant to the banking domain, capturing key entities (e.g., financial products, regulations), their attributes, and relationships.
• Step 2: Integrate this structured knowledge into the LLM’s fine-tuning process, using techniques like entity embedding, graph attention, or knowledge distillation.
• Step 3: Train the LLM to leverage the integrated knowledge graph to provide more informed and contextually relevant responses to banking queries.
• Real-world example: An LLM with integrated knowledge about banking products and their features can provide more accurate and detailed comparisons or recommendations when asked about specific products.
• Real-world example: By integrating knowledge about financial regulations and compliance requirements, an LLM can more effectively assist in tasks like risk assessment or compliance monitoring.
• Real-world example: Integrating knowledge about customer segments and preferences can enable an LLM to provide more personalized financial advice or product suggestions.
• Real-world example: An LLM with integrated knowledge of economic indicators and market trends can offer more insightful analysis and forecasting for financial planning and investment decisions.
• Key differentiation: Knowledge graph integration equips LLMs with structured, domain-specific knowledge, enabling them to provide more accurate, informed, and context-aware responses compared to models relying solely on unstructured text data.

Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback:

• Refining an LLM’s outputs through cycles of human feedback and reinforcement learning to align with desired behavior.
• “Training” the AI model to generate better responses by having human experts rate its outputs and using that feedback to guide its learning.
• Step 1: Set up a user interface for human experts (e.g., banking professionals) to interact with the LLM and provide feedback on its responses.
• Step 2: The LLM generates responses to banking-related prompts, which are then rated by the human experts based on criteria like accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness.
• Step 3: Use the human feedback as rewards in a reinforcement learning algorithm to update the LLM’s parameters, encouraging it to generate outputs that align with the desired banking-specific behavior.
• Real-world example: A banking chatbot fine-tuned with reinforcement learning and human feedback can learn to provide more accurate and appropriate responses to customer inquiries over time.
• Real-world example: An LLM for financial document summarization can be refined through expert feedback to generate summaries that better capture key information and insights.
• Real-world example: Human feedback can help train an LLM to generate more compliant and risk-aware responses in the context of financial regulations and guidelines.
• Real-world example: Reinforcement learning with human feedback can enable an LLM to adapt its language and tone to better suit different customer segments or interaction channels.
• Key differentiation: Reinforcement learning with human feedback allows LLMs to learn directly from expert knowledge and preferences, generating outputs that are more aligned with human judgement and domain-specific best practices compared to unsupervised learning.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning:

• Concept: Applying techniques to efficiently fine-tune an LLM for domain-specific tasks without modifying all model parameters, reducing computational costs.
• Layman: “Optimizing” the AI model for a specific domain by strategically adjusting only the most relevant parts, making the fine-tuning process faster and more resource-efficient.
• Step 1: Identify the most relevant parameters or layers of the LLM for the banking domain, using techniques like parameter analysis or sensitivity studies.
• Step 2: Apply parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques, such as adapter modules (inserting small trainable layers between existing layers) or low-rank adaptation (LoRA, learning a low-rank decomposition of the parameter matrices).
• Step 3: Fine-tune the LLM on banking-specific data, updating only the selected parameters or modules while keeping the rest of the model fixed.
• Real-world example: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning can enable faster and more cost-effective adaptation of large LLMs to specific banking tasks, such as risk assessment or fraud detection.
• Real-world example: Adapter modules can be used to fine-tune an LLM for multiple banking tasks or languages without the need for full model retraining, saving computational resources.
• Real-world example: Low-rank adaptation can help fine-tune an LLM for banking applications with limited training data, as it reduces the number of parameters to be learned.
• Real-world example: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques can enable more frequent updates and improvements to banking LLMs, as they require less time and resources compared to full model retraining.
• Key differentiation: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning allows for faster, more resource-efficient adaptation of LLMs to domain-specific tasks, enabling more agile development and deployment of banking-specific language models compared to traditional fine-tuning approaches..

Another View — TRaining or FInetuning

twitter.com

Option 1: Using Pretrained LLM via In-Context Learning

Concept: Leveraging a pretrained large language model (LLM) without further fine-tuning, using context to guide responses. Layman: Using the AI as-is by providing it with specific examples to follow.

1. Use a pretrained LLM.
2. Provide examples within the input text.
3. No additional training required.
4. Relies on the model’s existing knowledge.
5. Effective for diverse tasks.
6. Limited by the model’s pre-existing capabilities.
7. Fast and resource-efficient.
8. No labeled data required.
9. Suitable for one-off tasks.
10. Not ideal for highly specialized domains.

Option 2: Finetuned LLM with Labeled Target Data

Concept: Finetuning a pretrained LLM with specific labeled data to improve performance in a target domain. Layman: Customizing the AI by training it further with specific examples.

1. Use a pretrained LLM.
2. Collect labeled target data.
3. Fine-tune the model with this data.
4. Enhances domain-specific performance.
5. Requires computational resources.
6. Time-consuming.
7. Needs labeled data preparation.
8. Improved accuracy for target tasks.
9. Better suited for specialized applications.
10. Results in a more robust model for specific use cases.

Option 3: Pretrained LLM on Domain-Specific Corpus (In-Context Learning)

Concept: Utilizing an LLM pretrained on both general and domain-specific corpora, used via in-context learning. Layman: Using a more knowledgeable AI by giving it extra relevant data.

1. Pretrain LLM on general text corpus.
2. Further pretrain on domain-specific corpus.
3. Use the model as-is with context examples.
4. No additional fine-tuning required.
5. Increases domain relevance.
6. Faster adaptation for domain-specific tasks.
7. Limited by initial pretraining.
8. Requires significant domain-specific data.
9. Effective for certain specialized tasks.
10. Quick deployment without further training.

Option 4: Finetuned LLM with Domain-Specific Pretraining

Concept: Combining domain-specific pretraining and fine-tuning with labeled data for optimal performance. Layman: Fully customizing the AI by giving it lots of relevant data and then training it with specific examples.

1. Pretrain LLM on general text corpus.
2. Further pretrain on domain-specific corpus.
3. Collect labeled target data.
4. Fine-tune the model with this data.
5. Highest domain relevance.
6. Computationally intensive.
7. Time-consuming but effective.
8. Needs extensive labeled data.
9. Best accuracy for target domain tasks.
10. Ideal for highly specialized and critical applications.

Evaluating Domain-Specific LLM Performance

kili-technology.com

Here is a table summarizing some key considerations for evaluating the performance of domain-specific large language models (LLMs):

In addition to traditional accuracy metrics, a comprehensive evaluation of domain-specific LLMs requires assessing the model across a broad range of factors. Holistic evaluation frameworks like HELM help standardize this process by defining a core set of scenarios and metrics to measure model performance and facilitate direct comparisons.Domain-specific benchmarks are also critical for testing LLM capabilities on targeted tasks relevant to the intended use case. Benchmarks like EconQA for economics enable evaluating models on field-specific questions, while clinical benchmarks like DocOA assess real-world performance on tasks like osteoarthritis management.Beyond raw accuracy, it’s important to evaluate the model’s calibration, or how well its confidence levels align with actual performance. Robustness to varying conditions, fairness across demographic groups, and ability to avoid generating toxic or biased content are also key considerations.Efficiency metrics like inference speed and computational overhead impact the cost and viability of deploying the model in production. For customer-facing applications, evaluating the overall user experience in terms of output relevance, interaction intuitiveness, graceful error handling, and user satisfaction is crucial.Finally, exploring novel interaction paradigms, such as leveraging smaller domain expert models to imbue LLMs with specialized knowledge, can significantly boost performance on industry-specific tasks compared to the LLM alone.

Challenges in Curating Specialized Training Data

research.aimultiple….

Data curation for specialized domains like banking presents several challenges. Some key issues include:

Curating specialized training data for domain-specific LLMs is a complex and multifaceted challenge. By addressing issues related to data quality, representativeness, annotation, privacy, scalability, collaboration, evaluation, and ethics, organizations can build high-quality, diverse, and reliable training datasets. Leveraging the right tools and techniques, such as data cleaning pipelines, annotation platforms, privacy-preserving methods, distributed computing frameworks, and ethical AI toolkits, can help overcome these challenges and enable the development of robust and effective domain-specific LLMs

Comprehensive LLM Evaluation Metrics

medium.com

Evaluating the performance of domain-specific large language models (LLMs) requires a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics. Here are ten key considerations for assessing domain-specific LLM performance:

1. Holistic Evaluation Frameworks: Standardize evaluation using frameworks like HELM (Holistic Evaluation of Language Models) that assess LLMs across core scenarios such as question answering and information retrieval. These frameworks evaluate models on metrics like calibration, robustness, fairness, bias, toxicity, and efficiency, providing a comprehensive view of model performance.
2. Domain-Specific Benchmarks: Utilize benchmarks tailored to the target domain, such as EconQA for economics or DocOA for osteoarthritis management. These benchmarks test LLMs on domain-relevant multiple-choice questions and real-world applications, providing a more accurate assessment of their performance in specialized contexts.
3. Calibration and Robustness: Assess the model’s ability to provide well-calibrated responses, where the confidence levels align with the accuracy of predictions. Evaluate robustness by measuring performance consistency across varying conditions and inputs, ensuring the model maintains reliability in different scenarios.
4. Fairness and Bias: Analyze model outputs for demographic biases and ensure equitable performance across different groups. Evaluating fairness is crucial to prevent the model from producing prejudiced or discriminatory outputs that could harm users or reinforce societal biases.
5. Toxicity Detection: Measure and mitigate the toxicity of model-generated content using toxicity detection tools and sentiment analysis. Ensuring the model’s responses are free from offensive, harmful, or inappropriate content is essential for maintaining user trust and safety, particularly in customer-facing applications.
6. Efficiency Metrics: Consider the computational efficiency of the LLM, including factors like inference speed and resource requirements. Efficient models provide faster response times and are more cost-effective to deploy, which is crucial for large-scale, real-time applications.
7. User Experience Evaluation: Assess the overall user experience when interacting with the domain-specific LLM. Focus on aspects like the relevance and usefulness of responses, interaction intuitiveness, user satisfaction, and the model’s ability to handle errors gracefully. These factors are particularly important for applications like customer service chatbots.
8. Novel Interaction Paradigms: Explore innovative approaches to enhance LLM performance, such as empowering the model with domain-specific knowledge generated by smaller expert models. This paradigm allows the LLM to leverage specialized knowledge for improved accuracy on industry-specific question-answering tasks.
9. Ground Truth Comparison: Evaluate the LLM’s predictions against carefully annotated ground truth datasets that represent the desired outcomes. This comparison provides an objective measure of the model’s accuracy and effectiveness in capturing real-world language patterns and domain knowledge.
10. Comparative Analysis and Model Fusion: Conduct comparative studies across different domain-specific LLMs and fine-tuning techniques to identify their relative strengths and weaknesses. Investigate approaches like model fusion, where domain knowledge from specialized models is integrated into general-purpose LLMs, as this can significantly boost performance on targeted tasks.

Key Takeaways and Recommendations

cameronrwolfe.substa…

In conclusion,

1. Domain-specific LLMs can significantly outperform general-purpose models on specialized tasks and industries.
2. Fine-tuning a pre-trained LLM on domain-specific data is often more practical than training from scratch, requiring less data, compute, and time.
3. Effective fine-tuning techniques include domain-specific data fine-tuning, task-specific fine-tuning, instruction fine-tuning, knowledge graph integration, reinforcement learning with human feedback, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning.
4. Training domain-specific LLMs from scratch offers greater control over model architecture and training data but is resource-intensive. Autoregressive pre-training on domain text and retrieval-augmented generation are promising approaches.
5. Continual pre-training, starting from a general LLM and further training on domain data, can leverage transfer learning while mitigating catastrophic forgetting.
6. Comprehensive evaluation of domain-specific LLMs should assess not just accuracy but also calibration, robustness, fairness, efficiency, and user experience, using domain-specific benchmarks.
7. Empowering LLMs with domain knowledge from smaller expert models can boost performance on industry-specific question-answering.
8. Curating high-quality, diverse, and representative domain-specific training data is critical but challenging. Key issues include data quality, privacy, labeling, handling unstructured data, scalability, and keeping pace with domain evolution.
9. Tools for data cleaning, annotation, privacy preservation, distributed computing, collaboration, and evaluation can help address data curation challenges.
10. Ethical considerations like fairness, transparency, and accountability must be integrated into the data curation and model development process.
11. For most domain-specific applications, fine-tuning a pre-trained LLM strikes the best balance between performance, resource efficiency, and development speed.
12. The fine-tuning process should incorporate a mix of techniques tailored to the specific domain and use case, such as task-specific data, instruction tuning, and human feedback.
13. Where possible, integrating structured domain knowledge through techniques like knowledge graph integration can further boost LLM performance and interpretability.
14. Thorough evaluation using domain-specific benchmarks and metrics is essential to validate the fine-tuned model’s performance and suitability for real-world deployment.
15. Ongoing research into data-efficient and computationally-scalable training techniques, as well as approaches for imbuing LLMs with domain knowledge, will continue to drive progress in domain-specific language models.