Suede
Suede
Feb 24, 2017 · 1 min read

Interesting point, Mr. Gandhi. I would like to say that in both examples mentioned above (N. Korea and Cuba), there were alternative trading partners. In Cuba’s case when Eisenhower banned the import of sugar, the Soviet Union opted to purchase the excess supply. Regarding N. Korea, trade can be found elsewhere in countries such as Russia and most importantly China. It could be argued that economic tools were inappropriately used, as the severity to the economies was not impactful enough to incite change. Having said this, one could claim that Cuba suffered tremendously due to its geographic proximity to the US. For Fidel Castro, however, this allowed for a chance to build hatred towards the US and accuse the US of acting belligerently.

    Suede

    Written by

    Suede

    Showing both sides of the Suede

    Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
    Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
    Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade