But did you read the comments to that article? Its apparent he was never an MRA — he’s just a caricature of what feminists think MRAs are like. He’s a strawman set up as a punching bag for feminists to joust at, without an actual ability to address or negate any real MRA concerns. I feel that feminism continues to remain speechless when it comes to issues raised by the MRM, and so it must setup strawmen instead to knock to the ground.