I’ve seen parodies like this before as a school child, where the structure was kept the same but the words were swapped to make a conflicting point. I was taught not only was this allowed, but this is a legitimate criticism of the original work.

So I’m confused to see why people are calling it theft. I feel that they are only making that accusation because they didn’t like what the parody implied, not because they viewed it as actual plagiarism (which it’s not as it does the opposite of concealing the original author of the work).

The thing is that we’ve always been focused on how men feel.

Historically, possibly, but currently? I think that only applies to a small, privileged fraction of men. There seems to be an invisible populus with no voice, because they are assumed to have one in every other sphere, which does not appear to be true. When everyone is making the assumption men are overrepresented, we just end up with underrepresentation.