Pernicious: because it co-opts and hijacks a field of studies, and its vocabulary, that emerged as a political movement and is already under serious threat.
The “Conceptual Penis” hoax: A con-job, co-option, or something way worse?
Proshant Chakraborty

That’s the problem: pushing politics is not academic. Indoctrination is not academic. Rejecting all self-analysis is not academic. Reducing the world into a Marxist, binary dichotomy is hardly a pillar of intellectual inquiry.

You co-opt the vocabularies of science, higher education, and liberalism to push an ideology that is not scientific, intellectually honest, or liberal.

A single golf clap? Or a long standing ovation?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.