Your piece was 9/10 daydreaming and 1/10 actual facts. You appear to be more concerned with what you want to happen than what is actually happening.

I can hear his inner monologue with every swish of his hips.

This is is incredibly presumptuous of you, especially given that you don’t really understand the Milo phenomenon.

Part of his popularity is that he speaks truth to power. He represents a new generation of young conservatives who seek another choice besides elitist proselytization — from both the left and the right. He has become the avatar of at least one counterculture so marginized they normally congregate only in cyberspace.

That’s not to say I personally agree with much Milo has to say. For reference, I score moderately liberal on every political compass test I’ve taken.

So what if there is some sexism and racism tossed in? It’s irrelevant. So long as progressives refuse to engage in any intellectually honest discourse while masturbating themselves with character assassination and smear campaigns against anyone they dislike, people like Milo will find vast support.

Irresponsible celebrity feminists tell women, in a constant orgy of affirmation, to love themselves no matter what their size or shape and that no matter what they look like, they are beautiful and “real.”…Such advice is selfish, cruel, and a lie. In fact, if you want to attract the attention of a high-value potential husband, you’re much better off doing things that will make you pretty — spending time with puppies, children and flowers and listening to Mariah Carey ballads — rather than indulging in today’s dykeish and profanity-laced female empowerment culture.

Is he wrong? I have yet to meet a heterosexual, feminist woman who was not primarily attracted to masculine traits. Do you really think these women can reject gender roles for themselves but successfully demand it in men? Do you think most men can retain affection and loyalty for a domineering, short-haired fat dyke who has all the entitlements of a hot girl without even trying to become attractive?

When Muslims call for the murder of homosexuals in the months leading up to the largest mass shooting in American history, they will receive absolutely no blowback whatsoever, as we are told this was due to assault rifles and toxic masculinity.

Is he wrong? Why can’t there be an honest conversation about Western liberal ideals being fundamentally incompatible with hegemonic religions? This isn’t a question about Muslims, it’s about Islam and how it is practiced outside the west. Assault rifles, trucks, and stereotypes do not choose to kill people — humans do.

If a Syrian refugee wants to immigrate into the United States but thinks homosexuality must be punished by death, what do you do? Or is just trying to abuse and shutdown anyone who has to actually deal with the real-life consequences perfectly acceptable?

Otherwise, we are left with no option but to hand the reins over to the loudest or most aggressive minority, irrespective of the validity of their arguments. That leaves us with suicide bombers and trannies as the most powerful minorities in the west and you know what, no offence, but I don’t want private hiring decisions or, for that matter, public policy being influenced by either of them.

Is he wrong? Because here he is completely correct. Those of us who have become well-adjusted to various isms aren’t the ones complaining about microagressions. That’s reserved to those either so coddled or entitled that they think the world should change for them.

If ten black people say that black children can succeed if they become strong and try hard enough, but one half-black entitled princess whose daddy paid for an Afro-American studies major in college instead one whitey will keep you down no matter what you do, which one gets on CNN or is given an entire show by MTV?

By feminist standards, Milo was raped as a child. Whatever happened to believe accusers and support victims of trauma in the way they see best? Because that’s exactly what Milo is doing — he refuses to cast himself as a victim and instead insists he had agency in that situation.