Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read
Do you think one can, by being loud and arguing with a 1000 irrelevant bullet points, seize control of the agenda, if we follow your advice, and argue against such a person bullet by bullet? / I think doing what you are suggesting is the opposite of helpful.
One must use their स्वतः विवेक (sorry I don’t know that exact translation (close to self-acquired-intellegence)) to decide if and when something should be counter-argued bullet by bullet.
