Why Embeddings Usually Outperform TF-IDF: Exploring the Power of NLP

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a field of computer science that involves the processing and analysis of human language. It is used in various applications such as chatbots, sentiment analysis, speech recognition, and more. One of the important tasks in NLP is text classification, where we classify the text into different categories based on their content.

In the past, one of the popular methods for text classification was the TF-IDF approach. However, with the advent of deep learning, another approach called word embeddings has become more popular. In this article, we will discuss why embeddings are usually better than TF-IDF for text classification.

What is TF-IDF?

TF-IDF stands for Term Frequency — Inverse Document Frequency. It is a statistical method that is used to evaluate the importance of a word in a document. The TF-IDF approach calculates a score for each word in a document, which reflects its importance in that document.

The TF-IDF score for a word in a document is calculated using the following formula:

TF-IDF = TF * IDF

Where TF is the term frequency of the word in the document, and IDF is the inverse document frequency of the word. The term frequency is the number of times a word appears in a document, while the inverse document frequency is a measure of how common or rare the word is in the entire corpus of documents.

TF-IDF is a bag-of-words approach, which means it does not consider the order of the words in the document. It only considers the frequency of the words in the document and the corpus.

What are embeddings?

Word embeddings are a type of representation of words in a vector space. Word embeddings represent words as vectors in a high-dimensional space, where words with similar meanings are clustered together. These vectors capture the semantic meaning of words, which makes them useful for various NLP tasks such as text classification, sentiment analysis, and more.

Word embeddings are trained using neural networks, specifically, the word2vec or GloVe architecture. The word2vec architecture is a neural network model that learns to predict the context of a word based on its surrounding words. The GloVe architecture, on the other hand, learns word embeddings by factorizing the co-occurrence matrix of the words in the corpus.

Why are embeddings (usually) better than TF-IDF?

There are several reasons why embeddings are usually better than TF-IDF for text classification.

1. Embeddings capture the semantic meaning of words

Unlike TF-IDF, which only considers the frequency of words in a document, embeddings capture the semantic meaning of words. This means that words with similar meanings are closer together in the embedding space, making it easier for the model to classify documents based on their content.

For example, in an embedding space, the words “car” and “vehicle” would be close together, as they have similar meanings. In a TF-IDF approach, these words would be treated as separate entities, without any consideration for their meaning.

2. Embeddings capture the context of words

Embeddings also capture the context of words. This means that words that are used in similar contexts are closer together in the embedding space. For example, the words “apple” and “pear” are often used in the context of fruits. In an embedding space, these words would be close together, making it easier for the model to classify documents based on their content.

3. Embeddings handle out-of-vocabulary words

One of the limitations of TF-IDF is that it cannot handle out-of-vocabulary words, i.e., words that are not present in the vocabulary. In contrast, embeddings can handle out-of-vocabulary words by mapping them to a vector in the embedding space.

4. Embeddings can be pre-trained on large datasets

Another advantage of embeddings is that they can be pre-trained on large datasets, which can save time and resources in training the model. Pre-trained embeddings are available for many languages, and they can be used as a starting point for training models for specific NLP tasks.

5. Embeddings can capture relationships between words

Embeddings can capture relationships between words, such as synonyms, antonyms, and analogies. For example, in an embedding space, the vector for “king” minus the vector for “man” plus the vector for “woman” would be close to the vector for “queen”. This makes it easier for the model to learn relationships between words, which can improve its performance on text classification tasks.

Code snippets for using embeddings and TF-IDF :

Here is an example of how to use embeddings and TF-IDF for text classification using Python and the Scikit-learn library:

Using embeddings:

import numpy as np
from gensim.models import Word2Vec

# Train a word2vec model on a corpus of text
model = Word2Vec(sentences, size=100, window=5, min_count=1, workers=4)

# Convert text into vectors using the word2vec model
vectors = []
for sentence in sentences:
    vector = np.zeros(100)
    for word in sentence:
        vector += model.wv[word]
    vectors.append(vector)

# Use the vectors to train a text classification model

Using TF-IDF:

from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.svm import SVC

# Convert text into TF-IDF vectors
vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer()
vectors = vectorizer.fit_transform(documents)

# Use the vectors to train a text classification model
classifier = SVC()
classifier.fit(vectors, labels)

Benefits of using embeddings and TF-IDF

Using embeddings and TF-IDF can provide several benefits for text classification tasks:

1. Improved accuracy: Embeddings and TF-IDF can improve the accuracy of text classification models by capturing the semantic meaning and context of words.
2. Reduced feature space: Embeddings and TF-IDF can reduce the feature space of text classification models by representing words as vectors, which can save computational resources and improve the performance of the model.
3. Generalization: Pre-trained embeddings can be used to generalize text classification models to new datasets and tasks, which can save time and resources in training the model.

Conclusion

In conclusion, embeddings are usually better than TF-IDF for text classification tasks because they capture the semantic meaning and context of words, handle out-of-vocabulary words, can be pre-trained on large datasets, and can capture relationships between words. However, TF-IDF can still be useful in some cases, such as when the focus is on the frequency of specific words rather than their semantic meaning. In general, it is recommended to experiment with both approaches to determine which one works best for a specific text classification task.

Some Other useful articles:

“Streamlining the Machine Learning Workflow with ONNX and ONNX Runtime”

Dockerizing Data Science

Python Libraries for Data Science

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR)

Comparing black-box vs. white-box modeling

Understanding Machine Learning: Exploring the World of Artificial Intelligence, part-1