I find most of what you’re saying disagreeable. I don’t think you’re in touch with history and therefore are batting around a false premise. I don’t think you or most anyone else could name more than five wars that weren’t fought for some sort of lucre. Even the Vietnam war was fought for the drug trade, mainly because Johnson couldn’t afford it.
So when you talk about the young people going to fight overseas and calling them all kinds of names, you’re dead wrong. If those kids had paid attention during history class they’d know what was going on. However, most of them don’t think about the billionieres or the oil or anything else. They’re right there, they can see the damage done by such groups as ISIS, and their hearts burn for the children and women and old people that were slaughtered. They do everything they can to help them, they help them rebuild their houses and schools and fix the water wells and electric grids. And you sit in your nice, comfortable chair with the sun streaming through your window and write hate speaches based only on what you might have read somewhere on the internet. Those kids over there are heros, every last one of them, the men and women who have fallen in combat at true heros, no different than the names of the men and women on monuments in town squares all across America. And so many, like my brother, on the Wall in DC. So don’t sit on your ass and belittle the kids that are sent overseas, but write your nasty articles about the politicians who spend money getting congress and the president to get into a war.