Traditional Church of Satan Smoking Gun
Real Theistic Satanic Leader Exposes Hypocrisy in the Internet Church!
Defining Hypocrisy The Traditional Church of Satan
Dr. Tom Erik Raspotnik
As a Theistic Satanist for over twenty five years, and with contacts throughout Theological Studies, I have to openly reveal the “Smoking Gun” on the Traditional Church of Satan and it’s leader who has been fanatical defamer and slanderer of my wife, an actual Theistic Church and several other people who are involved in Satanism, because he cannot read effectively any form of historical text.
Today, on his Face Book Post he exclaimed with a angry tone, why are people (speaking of me the writer of this blog) using Judaism or Christianity to explain Satan. Well Robert the Retard it seem like you person in question forgot the word is Hebrew and is related to Judaism.
This same Church also was once The Church of Leviathan which I will as a educated person in Judaism and Theistic Satanism explain today for the public.
His answer is always the same questioning my Fort Jones PhD so let’s take that out of play and just use my 75 classes along in Theological Studies and 25 years a understudy by a Dual Master Degree Sumerian Expert who is employed in interpreting Cuneiform from Pre-Flood Tablets. So next argument please I do know what I am talking about Traditional Church of Satan but I don’t need my expertise or experience of historical background. I got the Smoking Gun:
Explain to the public why you would use the Church of Leviathan as a name then condemn Judaism?
Leviathan, in the Bible, one of the names of the primeval dragon subdued by Yahweh at the outset of creation: “You crushed Leviathan’s heads, gave him as food to the wild animals” (Psalm 74:14; see also Isaiah 27:1; Job 3:8; Amos 9:3). Biblical writers also refer to the dragon as Rahab (Job 9:13; Psalm 89:10) or simply as the Abyss (Habakkuk 3:10).
The biblical references to the battle between Yahweh and Leviathan reflect the Syro-Palestinian version of a story found throughout the ancient Near East. In this myth, creation is represented as the victory of the creator-god over a monster of chaos.
The closest parallel to the biblical versions of the story appears in the Canaanite texts from Ra’s Shamrah (14th century BC), in which Baal defeats a dragon like monster: “You will crush Leviathan the fleeing serpent; you will consume the twisting serpent, the mighty one with seven heads.” (The wording of Isaiah 27:1 draws directly on this text.)
A more ancient version of the story occurs in the Babylonian Creation Epic, in which the storm god Marduk defeats the sea monster Tiamat and creates the earth and sky by cleaving her corpse in two. The latter motif is reflected in a few biblical passages that extol Yahweh’s military valor: “Was it not you who split Rahab in half, who pierced the dragon through?” (Isaiah 51:9; see also Job 26:12; Psalm 74:13, 89:10).
Rejection of Judaism? Did you not write about Arch Angels in one of your terrible books, the concept is Christian in case you don’t know with underpinnings of Judaism.
Another point are you taking notes yet? Traditional Church of Satan Members?
Bring me a apple!
From the Babylonians comes the legend of Adapa. It carries the theme of the serpent’s warning to Eve, that God had deceived her about the forbidden fruit.
Adapa, son the god of Wisdom, Ea, broke the wing of the Storm bird who attacked him in the Persian Gulf. Ea summoned Adapa to question his violence and warned him that, having displeased Anu, King of Heaven, the gods would offer him the food and drink of death, which he must refuse. Anu, however, learning of this indiscreet disclosure, tried to foil Ea by offering Adapa the bread of life and the water of life instead. When Adapa refused, Anu sent him back to earth as a mortal.
This is all historical not Tom Erik Raspotnik said so: but someone a hypocrite forgets old names and statements and then judges people who are trying to use historians and documents to explain the truth instead of “cut and paste” internet bullshit or some chapter from a movie you watched as a kid.
But more hypocrisy as the leader uses a non Theistic Symbol INSTEAD a adaption of Anton La Vey’s depictions of symbols to Satan, no ties lie in Tia mat to this symbol whatsoever and it actually would be more Christian because of ties to Lucifer, so the reader can ask Mr. Leader of Theistic Satanism “self appointed” why is not a Lucifer worshiper and why would be insulting Tia mat if he is so much of faith by not using a symbol for her who in Judaism of course which he claims others are so terrible in using. Does Micheal W. Ford like you Symbol of Phosphorus, Tia mat not even close.
A symbol for the alchemical element Sulfur, (Brimstone) which is spiritually analogous to the human soul. Alchemical, sulfur has the qualities of masculine, hot and dry. Combined with Mercury (feminine, cool and moist), the pair were considered the parents of all metals.
Alchemical drawings often portray Sulfur as the sun. (In some views, sulfur and salt are the parents of Mercury) The symbol of sulfur is often used as an identifying symbol by Satanists, due to sulfur’s historical association with the devil. (Christianity).
This glyph is often referred to incorrectly as the “pontifical cross of Satan” by untrained Christian tract writers, due to its adoption as an emblem of Satanism by Anton LaVey in the 1960s.
The emblem has no history as a symbol of Satanism outside of LaVey’s usage, and the attribution is most likely a product of anti-Catholic sentiment, as it is often compared in this context to the Catholic Pontifical Cross. A more common symbol for sulfur is a fire triangle surmounting a cross of earth:
Check Mate
This is why people need to study historians and scholars over “self appointee’s” who are defaming and trolling everyone instead of learning actual history. Traditional Church of Satan members the few there are how long will you let this man mislead you towards the Judaism or Christianity he is using to explain to you Satanism?
One last point: I suggest before you try to teach people falsehood and before you try to be a spiritually connected leader you immerse yourself in studies that will enhance your knowledge instead of attacking and defaming those of us who try to teach people from history, I can imagine how you book which is full of contradictions must be a hard read for the sane Occultist’s out there….
Thanks
I am sorry Traditional Church of Satan Members Tia mat refers to the Creator not Satan….
The Truth Hurts!