Except they have a library of extremely rigorous literature showing how taking normal definitions and applying them to government behavior results in the label of tyranny.
Also, you literally cite in this article MULTIPLE articles where libertarians are talking about how to communicate to people that we have similar goals and values to different factions in different situations. Yes, libertarians will technically hold that certain values are immorally/inefficiently violent and should be frowned upon. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll disown everybody, even when other factions are for something they agree on.
I legitimately do not understand why you are as vitriolic as this. It’s one thing if you disagree with their arguments, but instead you go straight to “Libertarians are all F****** LIARS!!!!!” You then cite sources that aren’t even remotely libertarian canon and are concerned with showing people how to present the NAP, et al., in a way that people can identify with so that they’ll give it a fair shot. Learning how to argue political ideology in a constructive manner is hardly deception.