Gender Identity Needs to Be Based on Objective Evidence Rather Than Feelings

If we abandon the testimony of experts, we may find ourselves at the mercy of whoever shouts loudest, writes Debbie Hayton, a trans teacher

The Economist
7 min readJul 17, 2018

--

Photo by Vince Fleming on Unsplash

By Debbie Hayton

When Tara Wolf assaulted Maria MacLachlan at Speakers’ Corner on September 13th 2017, a social-media dispute between transgender activists and radical feminists burst out onto the streets of London. Ms MacLachlan, a 60-year-old woman, was going to a feminist meeting that had been forced to move to a secret venue after protests by a group of transgender activists that included Ms Wolf, a 26-year-old trans woman.

Tensions had been raised three months earlier, when Britain’s government announced that it would consult the public on changes to the Gender Recognition Act of 2004, which sets out the steps transgender people must take to get their new gender identity recognised in law. The proposals included gender self-identification, effectively allowing applicants to change their legal sex by simply declaring their intention “to live in their preferred gender” for the rest of their life. They would no longer have to provide medical reports attesting to gender dysphoria, or evidence that they had lived in the target gender…

--

--

The Economist

Insight and opinion on international news, politics, business, finance, science, technology, books and arts.