The problem is not the tear, rather it’s significance as his gut reaction to gun violence through…

…but, I wonder if this perception itself — the association of ‘cold and calculating’ with good authority and leadership, is not, in part, reinforcing hegemonic masculinities. What I mean to say is, it’s no accident that the same qualities we associate with ‘traditional’ manhood are also considered the qualities of a good leader.

In fact, I argue, government policy is FULL of emotion. Look at the issue of gun control, for example. Is it a logical issue? Certainly- there are logical, reasoned (though often poorly reasoned) arguments both for and against it. Yet, it’s further a deeply emotional issue: gun ownership is about more than who can and cannot possess weapons, it’s an identity struggle between different social groups that have very different experiences with guns.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.