Wait, so I talk about a complaint regarding Lighting, and you start responding to something else?
Wouter Schut
1

Wouter, you are such a disingenuous person. Your complaint was “double-spends” regarding LN. You respond to literally everything else and pretend my explanation of how that is not a double-spend was never stated. Your description of a problem with LN is 1) wrong, and 2) is _not_ a double spend.

All you have done is just proclaim things are so, and offered no reasoning or evidence. And every attempt at reasoning you have made is based on falsely assumed axioms or just plain incorrect.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.