No I just specified a bunch right there, and not only that I told you that there were instances in which police get away with murder, how could it be possible that those are the more common place ones. What you are telling me is out of the nearly 600 people killed this year. The stars aligned to allow the system of checks and balances to kill them a huge amount, which what I’ve seen from the BLM narrative I know not to be true.
Yes because of the confounding variables, the data simply shows information you need to consider the distance between each individual two points yourself. I did not do any kind of intensive look at it. I simply mapped it out with estimates, looking at it it’s easy to tell the negative wins out. But the distance is rather similar on both ends of the spectrum, the regression is likely to show a correlation albeit not a strong one, less than .8 for sure, but still significant, around .4 — .6. But the data is unreliable because it picks and chooses major cities from the country to spout the BLM narrative in order for it to be valid, it needs to include all cities and I’m certain if we do the smaller cities we can see a correlation between violence and death as well.
No, that’s wrong, morality is relative. No matter the act, the end result is relative. Though the tendency for human beings to flock towards entropy exists. It’s just the biological imperative to preserve the human race, because that is the greatest good as wired into our genetics which determine the majority of our life outcome. This does not mean sparing the lives of criminals. As for cops having the leverage… do they? Because of this crazy BLM narrative which has made martyrs out of defacto villians cops will more and more hesitate to shoot at their enemy even though it may mean their own life, let’s take the example of the black guy who committed death by cop by grabbing at the cops gun in a struggle. Despite the fact he was telling the police officers to kill him the first time they reached for the gun they tried to talk him out of it and calm him down, the second time since he broke the hold on the holster the cop had no choice but to kill him.
yes, which is why you need to couple them with DOJ victimization statistics as I stated earlier. And because violent crimes like murder, have no statute of limitations in the US, the FBIs violent crime ratio should hold true. The implicit bias that exists is analogous to a game of black jack where you know to hit and to stay on certain numbers, it is a self caused black phenomenon that resulted from the proliferation of single motherhood due to welfare incentives. As I have stated before welfare, blacks had a lower crime rates than whites. And the effect of not having a nuclear family is dismal.
Incentives drive research studies, most researchers are robotic in nature so they need to couch their narrative or findings in order to get them through, for example a man who studied the gender pay gap myth tried to release his findings through different avenues but nobody would take them until he spun the results to say women choose to earn less than men, and here is what they can do about. The canadian HRC has time and time overstepped their bounds and looked for strife where there was none in order to keep the money coming in. They fined a comedian 100k for making a joke about a retarded kid, where is the sense in that? Comedy is supposed to take dark subjects and lighten them up. They have also made strict attacks on anyone who opposed to perform the act of gay marriage in their own establishment, though these other establishments exist where they can get gay married. They made money off the greivance industry and continue to do so, so they will never have a true version of the info. Just logically speaking profiling works. For the reasons I’ve stated before. And when logic is sound, you consider it rather than debating it with insanely biased sources.
Wrong, that’s lewontin’s fallacy. It has been debunked numerous times.
That would be true if blacks weren’t committing 4.3 more crimes than whites when you adjust the population sizes. This doesn’t even consider violent crime in which the ratio is much higher blacks to whites. The thing to remember is, blacks are committing such a enormously disproportionate rate of crime when compared to other subspecies in america.
And you are right, but you aren’t addressing this correctly. I am talking about the population of criminals, which is a very small percentage of the total US population. And these are the numbers we are focusing on not the total population, does this result in unfair searches and seizures of black people in comparison, yes. Does it explain violent crime which is what leads to police death most of the time… absolutely not.
No that is the logical fallacy of false equivalence, you are comparing two things that are not similar in the least bit. It would be more accurate to assume that if black women are 4.3x more likely to be pregnant then given a variety of different people and you had to pick on that was pregnant off hand, then picking the black one was the best bet. It’s odds just like kraps.
You’ve buffed up your argument from before but it’s still filled with too many holes.