The Worst Fighter Aircraft of All Time
War Is Boring

I think the B.E.2 is being slightly unfairly maligned here. It was never intended to be a fighter; indeed when it was designed that role didn’t exist. Aircraft were used for scouting and reconnaissance; to this end the Royal Aircraft Factory (not just Royal) drew on their pioneering research into aircraft stability to make the B.E.2 capable of being flown hands-off. Unfortunately the stability that made it a good reconnaissance platform made for a poor fighter in air-to-air combat, and once the 'Fokker scourge’ appeared the B.E.2 was mainly going to be a target. One of the reasons so many were built was because the Royal Aircraft Factory was one of the few aircraft manufacturers with a drawing office able to produce blueprints in any quantity for licence production; as a result B.E.2s were built by a variety of other companies. This fed into resentments about having to compete with a state aircraft factory, and in 1916 the whole matter came to a head and the Royal Aircraft Factory was turned into a pure R&D establishment. The B.E.2’s reputation has suffered partly because the aircraft was used as a scapegoat in this wider political argument.

Regarding the LaGG, it should be noted that once fitted with a better engine the design evolved into the LaGG-5 and LaGG-7, which were among the best Soviet fighters of the war.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.