and meets on a regular basis (i.e. at least every quarter)
Help improve the OGP’s co-creation guidelines!
Open Gov Partnership

Is this the most appropriate model for all countries and contexts?

If this is interpreted as F2F meetings, then risks creating a strong bias towards groups who can make it to capital cities.

If meetings are seen as the only place businesses is done — how does this fit with ideas of ongoing online and offline collaboration?

Perhaps better to think of the functions of the group should perform such as:

  • Regularly discusses progress on development and implementation of the NAP;
  • Regularly shares updates of discussions, either through meeting minutes, or agreed documents and statements from the group;

and then leave the modality for the groups operation as something to be developed locally, drawing on different examples from around the world.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.