Graham Realyze
Feb 23, 2017 · 1 min read

I wouldn’t say there’s a huge difference between say Python and JS. Python as a language is better designed but still prone to runtime errors (i.e., it doesn’t address the fundamental problem).

JS is very flexible so it gives you a lot of rope to hang yourself with. Hence the linters and hence FlowType and TypeScript. (Disclaimer: I’m using TypeScript on my projects.)

These days, the pendulum has swung from waterfall to agile and from big design to quick prototyping — and having a super flexible language with huge ecosystem is good for doing that. Of course you’ll have to pay the price later on in maintenance and I worry not everyone realises that.

BTW, JavaScript may be a poor language but it’s developing (”fixing itself”) at admirably fast pace. Also, the core of the language is IMHO a little gem (higher-order function, closures, prototypal inheritance — all pretty sweet). The biggest problem is the legacy burden (hi Microsoft!) which is not really a fault of the language per se.

    Graham Realyze

    Written by

    Professional programmer. Amateur photographer. Amateur guitar player. Amateur person. Working at salsita, a cool node.js company.

    Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight.
    Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox.
    Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month.