mike llewellyn:
umair haque

Dawkins apologised for going too far in trying to get to the truth of the “clock boy” story (see https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/sep/20/richard-dawkins-questions-ahmed-mohamed-motive-backlash). Acting on a hunch about what he knew about the events, Dawkins later saw that hunch was wrong.

Perhaps Mr Haque might behave similarly about his hunch about Mr Dawkins.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.