This soothsaying response is the exact kind of “concern trolling” that enables centralized agendas to advance.
The piece states a preference and delineates arguments. If you disagree, then write your own article.
To blithely state that specifying categories and making rational deductions is the “heart of the problem” is absurd.
Perhaps we’d be more open to your viewpoint if you weren’t wedded to business interests in the past that have been found in violation of SEC rules, with a subsequent fine.
I assure you, that isn’t an “assumption”, and if you’d like, I’d be happy to link verifying evidence.