U.S. Department of Justice, Q: why are non-attorneys ‘reviewing (examining) and rescinding’ sitting NYS WCALJudges’ decisions?
New York, NY | 2 hours ago
U.S. Department of Justice,
On 9/6/2013 NYS WCB commissioner(s) Munnelly + 2 non-attorneys
(Williams and Higgins) ‘reviewed (examined)
and rescinded’ my NYS WCALJudge Robert Anderson’s decision.
My attorneys (at the time) Fine, Olin & Anderman appealed and requested
a Full Board Review.
On 11/25/2013 NYS WCB chair Beloten solely denied me
a Full Board Review.
On 12/12/2013 the Third Judicial Department decided that
“only a three member panel can deny a Full Board Review”
(see Scalo v. Perry & Sons)
On 12/27/2013 NYS WCB chair Beloten got 2 subordinates (Libous
and Munnelly) to sign order denying me
a Full Board Review.
p.s.
Q1: was not Munnelly NYS WCB general counsel and NYS WCB ethics officer?
Q2: how much time did each person spend ‘reviewing’ (examining)
my NYS WCALJudge’s decision?
Q3: did Libous sign order denying me a Full Board Review
while in Florida or while in New York?
Q4: is not Libous a nurse?
Q5: why is a nurse ‘reviewing’ (examining) any NYS WCALJudge’s decision(s)?
p.p.s.
Trust but Verify
p.p.p.s.
http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/FBI-agents-raid-Libous-home-5684801.php