It’s only OK for a rapist to have adequate representation as long as it is not Hillary providing it….

I don’t most people have an issue with her doing her job to the best of her abilities. What most people find distasteful is her doing so gleefully, laughing about it. She laughed at the outcome, and said that her client passing a polygraph test made her forever lose faith in polygraphs. She knew he was guilty, defended him, and laughed at the outcome.

Why is it OK for women who have been cheated on to be pissed a the other women as long as it’s not Hillary?

Because Hillary has told us that it’s our responsibility to believe rape and sexual assault victims, yet she aggressively went after them when her husband was accused. People don’t react well to blatant hypocrisy.

Why is it OK for the entire Senate to vote for a war but when Hillary does it SHE’S RESPONSIBLE AND THE REASON WE HAVE A WAR AT ALL?

She’s obviously not solely responsible, but she’s the only one of the entire Senate running for president now isn’t she? It may not have been entirely her decision to go to war, but she was one of the members who gave the authority, therefore she deserves part of the blame.

Why is it OK for Colin Powell to use private email, even delete some but not Hillary…

Because although he used private email, he never setup a private server separate from any government safeguards. He didn’t email classified information on private email. He wasn’t found by the director of the FBI to have made false public statements about his email use, or found to be extremely careless in his handling of sensitive information.

many investigations…Republican lead, tax payer paid investigations…

…nothing found….

Nothing except….

Over 2000 classified emails.

110 emails classified when she sent or received them, directly contradicting her flat out denials.

15,000 additional work-related emails that Hillary Clinton told the public were personal, and then deleted without letting any disinterested third party verify her claim.

I could go on.

Hillary has been a public servant for 30 plus years. She has lead countless programs for children and many children (now adults) have benefited from her efforts. She has lead many programs for families, and many families today still benefit from her work.

Just because she’s been doing it a long time doesn’t mean she’s fit for office. She’s spent decades taking spending taxpayer dollars pursuing her politics, and becoming rich in the process.

She stood by a cheating husband and kept her family together…any other woman who was able to keep it together would be praised not persecuted…what the fuck….use that instead of she was pissed off at the other women….

I can’t say that i have any real knowledge of the relationship dynamics of their marriage. It may be that they are a loving couple and she has stood by her husband out of loyalty or some other such positive trait. But…my sense, and i think the sense most people get, is that they are a political power couple whose marriage is perhaps one of convenience at this point. A means to an end, rather then an end in itself. However, i will say that if she stood by her husband out of love and forgiveness, i fully respect that. That had to have been an incredibly difficult period in her life, and i can’t imagine the shame she went through having to deal with not only the infidelity, but having it bandied about in public.

The issue about the other women is, again, her taking a hypocritical stance in lecturing society on how we should treat women accusing someone of sexual assault, while completely ignoring said advice in her own life.

He’s a liar, he’s a thief, he’s a conman, he’s being puppeteered by Russia…and far too many want him for our president because somehow you think you know all you need to know about the last 30 years of Clinton public service….

I do think i know all i need to know about her from her 30 years of service. How much time does it really take to get to know someone’s policies? Also, how is it possible that you are deriding anyone’s ability to know her well enough after “only” 30 years of public service, while simultaneously claiming that you know all you need to know about Trump?

….do some real research on Hillary, stop believing the twisted lies about what she has truly done by a party that is desperate to survive…

Sure, how about the FBI’s words? How about her actual voting record? How about evaluating her actual performance as senator and Secretary of State? Can i evaluate those?

….really?….

….you have a problem with Hillary?….

A little bit, yeah.