Highway Robbery: How Texas Cops Turn Civil Asset Forfeiture into a Cash Grab at Your Expense
The Texas Civil Asset Forfeiture system is a deeply controversial practice that allows law enforcement to seize property suspected of being connected to criminal activity — even without charging the owner with a crime. Critics argue it violates constitutional rights and disproportionately impacts low-income communities, often without providing a fair process for property recovery. This practice is rooted in legal and financial mechanisms that prioritize law enforcement profits over justice. Texas seized over $50 million through this method in 2017 alone, without substantial accountability for its application.
Seizing Property Without Charging a Crime: A License to Plunder
In Texas, you don’t need to be convicted — or even charged — with a crime for law enforcement to take your stuff. This is the ugly core of the state’s civil asset forfeiture system, a legal framework that permits the seizure of property based on little more than a whiff of suspicion. In practice, law enforcement needs nothing more than probable cause that your assets — whether cash, cars, or even homes — might be connected to illegal activity. And “probable cause,” as anyone who’s ever read a police report can tell you, is the most elastic legal standard there is. It’s a glorified guess. Once your property is seized, the burden of proof shifts from the state to you — an innocent citizen — who must now prove your own innocence. Yes, you read that right. You must prove that your assets weren’t connected to a crime, even if you weren’t charged with one.
Innocence Doesn’t Matter When There’s Cash to Be Had
Perhaps the most jarring aspect of this legal fiasco is that 80% of civil asset forfeiture cases nationwide never lead to criminal charges. In Texas, while detailed data remains scarce due to reporting gaps, it’s clear the state follows this troubling trend. This system flips our justice principles on their head — innocent until proven guilty becomes guilty until you can afford a lawyer to prove your innocence. Take the case of a couple traveling through Tenaha, Texas in 2012. Police seized over $6,000 during a routine traffic stop, accusing them of trafficking cash with no other evidence — no drugs, no weapons, just cash. Even though no charges were ever filed, they had to endure a drawn-out legal battle to reclaim their money. And the city of Tenaha is no stranger to such dubious practices. Between 2006 and 2008, local law enforcement raked in more than $3 million from motorists in similar circumstances, many of whom were never charged with a crime. This legal piracy is not an anomaly but a systemic feature of Texas’s forfeiture machine.
The Impact on Innocent People: Legalized Theft
The harsh reality for many innocent property owners is that the financial and emotional costs of contesting these seizures are prohibitive. The burden of proof is so lopsided in favor of the state that many simply give up, particularly when the legal costs of recovering their property outweigh the value of what was taken. One particularly egregious case involved Elizabeth Young, a grandmother whose house and car were confiscated after her son was arrested for selling less than $200 worth of marijuana. She had no knowledge of her son’s activities, yet she had to fight for years to get her property back. This system operates on the assumption that the property itself is guilty — an absurd concept known as in rem proceedings, where the state sues the property rather than the owner.
The Financial Incentive: Policing for Profit
Here’s where things get really dystopian: Texas law allows law enforcement agencies to keep up to 100% of the proceeds from forfeitures. That’s right — the very people seizing your property get to keep it, or at least the cash value of it. It’s no wonder forfeiture has become such a favorite tool for Texas cops. In many cases, small towns and counties rely on forfeiture proceeds to prop up their budgets, creating a perverse incentive to seize as much as possible. In Reeves County, with a population under 20,000, forfeiture proceeds in 2012 were 15 times larger than the local prosecutor’s annual budget. This is the definition of a conflict of interest — when the same people enforcing the law stand to benefit financially from its application, how can they possibly be trusted to act impartially?
A System with No Safeguards: The Challenges of Reform
Given the outrage, you’d think reform would be a slam dunk, but in Texas, where law enforcement holds sway over the legislature, reform is easier said than done. In 2017, a bipartisan coalition tried to introduce several reforms to the system, including a requirement for criminal convictions before forfeiture could occur. Law enforcement officials fought back hard, claiming that this would cripple their ability to fight drug cartels and organized crime. These scare tactics worked; none of the major reforms passed. And in 2023, despite growing bipartisan support for change, the reform bill House Bill 3659 — which sought to raise the burden of proof and limit small-dollar seizures — passed in the House but stalled in the Senate without so much as a hearing.
The problem is obvious: civil asset forfeiture, as it stands, generates too much easy money for local police departments and prosecutors. And that money isn’t going toward rehabilitating drug users or funding community programs. It’s going to shiny new police cars, upgraded tactical gear, and who knows what else. The financial incentives baked into the system make meaningful reform nearly impossible because the people benefiting from forfeiture are the very ones tasked with enforcing the law.
A Tale of Two Justice Systems: Targeting the Vulnerable
If you think civil asset forfeiture applies equally to all Texans, think again. Like so many abusive law enforcement practices, civil forfeiture disproportionately affects low-income individuals and communities of color. In Harris County, where over 300 vehicles are seized annually, many of those targeted are Black or Latino drivers. These individuals often don’t have the financial resources to hire a lawyer to fight for their property, meaning they’re far more likely to lose it by default. And it’s not just cars and cash being taken — homes, businesses, and even life savings have been seized, often with no criminal charges ever filed.
The legal fees to contest a seizure often exceed the value of the property, especially in cases where small amounts of cash are taken. Imagine losing your vehicle during a routine traffic stop and being told that if you want it back, you’ll have to pay more in legal fees than the car is worth. This is how civil forfeiture operates — a rigged system designed to dissuade challenges and maximize profits for law enforcement.
The Legal Labyrinth: Good Luck Getting Your Stuff Back
Once your property has been seized, getting it back is a Kafkaesque nightmare. The legal process is arcane and filled with enough red tape to suffocate a small country. In many cases, property owners have as little as 10 days to file a claim contesting the forfeiture, and if you miss a single court date or file a document incorrectly, you could lose your property for good. And unlike criminal cases, where you have the right to an attorney, civil forfeiture cases don’t offer court-appointed lawyers. If you can’t afford one, you’re on your own.
Even when property owners manage to file the necessary paperwork and attend multiple hearings, the state still only needs to prove by a preponderance of the evidence — a much lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt” — that the property was connected to criminal activity. The deck is stacked, and the state knows it.
The Push for Reform: Too Little, Too Late?
Reform advocates aren’t giving up, though. Groups like the Institute for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have been fighting to change Texas’s civil forfeiture laws for years. They point to successful reforms in other states like New Mexico and Nebraska, where forfeiture is now only allowed after a criminal conviction. But in Texas, entrenched interests make reform a long, uphill battle. Law enforcement agencies argue that forfeiture is a crucial tool in the fight against drug trafficking, but the reality is that most forfeitures target small amounts of cash and property, not large-scale criminal enterprises.
There’s growing public support for change, and all three major political parties in Texas — Republican, Democrat, and Libertarian — have included civil forfeiture reform in their platforms. But unless lawmakers muster the courage to stand up to law enforcement lobbyists, meaningful reform may remain out of reach.
A Broken System Built on Profits, Not Justice
Texas’s civil asset forfeiture system is a cash cow for law enforcement, a broken system where your property can be taken without charges and where innocence is meaningless. The financial incentives ensure that law enforcement will continue to resist reform, and the legal barriers make it nearly impossible for property owners to reclaim what’s rightfully theirs.
Until Texas decides to prioritize due process and constitutional rights over police profits, innocent Texans will continue to be victims of a system that’s more about filling coffers than fighting crime. In a state that prides itself on personal liberty and limited government, civil asset forfeiture stands as a stark reminder that those principles don’t always apply when there’s money on the table.
You can view our citations in our source article here.
