This story is unavailable.

When you claim to be a “skeptic” despite overwhelming evidence confirming what you’re skeptical about, and you can’t provide any plausible explanation supporting your position, you just look like an idiot. When all you have is “I don’t believe that”, or “I don’t buy that”, or “that’s just indefensible”, you have nothing.

Imagine if Perry insisted that the earth is flat, and scientists from everywhere showed him clear evidence that it’s round. Would he look like an intelligent person qualified for his job if all he had was “I don’t buy that”?