Most people will say TLDR to a point by point rebuttal like this, but here we go anyways.

You don’t really understand the problem at all. For example, you write: “ There’s a reason you’re supposed to have a work email, which is to automatically preserve your work emails. Instead, we all have to rely on her judgment and simply take her word for the fact that all work related emails were turned over, and that not a single work related email was deleted in the supposedly personal emails.”

It is easy to find OIG reports documenting the broken archiving on the State Department official server. If State Department archiving worked, it would have been easy to look up all the official business emails Secretary Clinton sent from the recipients and cc’s at the state department. But it doesn’t and didn’t work.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.