The Outsurance Father’s Day debacle highlights the need for corporates to start understanding social issues.

A few Mother’s Days ago Bic insulted women, then there was Helen Zille, Rivers Church, Spur Steakranches, Chris Hart and Penny Sparrow. The list of social media disasters goes on and on.

It is almost inevitable that your company will experience the wrath of social media some time in the future. Probably in the next year to 18 months. Worldwide surveys have established that only 30% of companies have a crisis plan in place. Sometimes you need more than a crisis plan you need to actually understand why these blunders happen.

This week it’s Outsurance’s turn. They put out a social media video on Father’s Day to celebrate all the “good fathers” out there. The video showed 20 different fathers interacting with their children. With the exception of one, all those fathers were white.

It was no surprise that Twitter picked up on this to imply that black fathers are not good fathers, which is reinforcing a stereotype and climbed into Outsurance accusing it of racism.

The first “apology” by the head of marketing, Peter Cronjé, a white man, offered by the company, blamed a junior, a woman, for the error and apologised for the lack of the diversity in the ad that did not reflect the nation’s demographics. Later during the day the Group CEO, Willem Roos, a white man, in a Skype interview with ENCA apologised again. He confirmed that although the staff of Outsurance are very diversified, the board is mostly white and male.

If the social media commentary is accurate many have cancelled their policy and many people have decided not to support the company in the future.

Outsurance responds to its ‘racist’ Father’s Day ad, blames junior employee

As a case study ignoring for a moment the poor leadership that resulted in the junior employee being thrown under the bus, there are some very interesting takeouts.

A significant proportion of social media crisis in South Africa is due to racism of some sort. In Outsurance’s case this has become a pattern. A Mother’s Day video along the same lines, followed a campaign in which an person in blackface appeared and one in which a white family had a dog named Boipelo and adverts showing black people only in the roles of servants. These are not only all huge errors, they also reveal a mindset in the orgnisation and quite frankly in corporate South Africa.

Although much of the social response was divided on racial lines with many white commentators calling it a non-issue, many other white South African’s on social media were in solidarity with the black response, which is also an increasing trend.

The most important lesson to learn, is that it is clear that this business is white managed and the market response to racism is poorly appreciated. In fact I would go as far as to say that racism is not understood as an issue. Racism is not merely about prejudice, it’s not about making sure that all the Outsurance pointsmen are black, a point they have used in defence, that is like saying as a defence that “I have black friends.”

When Outsurance tweeted: “We apologise for our Father’s Day video. It did not appropriately represent SA’s demographics. It was an unintentional oversight,” they completely missed the point.

Racism is a system, a social and economic racial hierarchy introduced into South Africa by colonisation and codified by apartheid.

What Outsurance did was to feed a narrative that black fathers are not good fathers and white fathers are. They have not yet acknowledged that. Like many white run organisations they do not yet appreciate the essence of racism and that to be excellent corporate citizens it is important that they are anti-racist not merely non-racist.

No matter how “concerned” corporate South Africa wishes to position itself it is absolutely vital that they move beyond dictionary definitions of racism and address this issue in training for their boards and at least their marketing and sales staff. The need to be driving towards transformed management is not a point that I need to make.

The same thing goes with other social issues such as sexism. Cronjé said, “This advert was created by one of our junior ladies in the social media department and I believe she made an innocent mistake when she created and posted this video.” Why was it necessary to mention that the junior employee was female? Does that communicate that it’s a better excuse if a woman did it, like what would you expect?

Cronjé went on to mention that it is their policy to offer some responsibility to junior employees in the social media media department and that they don’t approve content at management level. This is also a huge error — social media has proven to be a very powerful tool, this expereince will school them that minimising its power is a serious management error.

Condemning racism has become a mega trend in South Africa. The social networks have become empowered ever since the out of work estate agent Penny Sparrow’s rant on Facebook. It’s a trend that all marketers should take cognizance of. It’s no longer possible for business to leave it to chance, unless the board, management and staff bury their own views and make an effort to understand the issues underlying racism, homophobia, and feminism to mention a few they are bound to end up splashed all over the electronic and broadcast media. That means that they are bound to lose business.

It has become an imperative for business to understand and appreciate the social issues driving the country. Apologising for when the internal culture is brought to the surface doesn’t cut it anymore.

Note: I wrote this article first for Bizcommunity and it appears here.