Thorsten Bredberg
Jul 28, 2017 · 2 min read

You write this: “ I have never, at any time, advocated an alliance, alignment, or compromise of any kind with the alt-right. You fucking idiots.”

Later on you write this: “ I’m writing about Cernovich because I used him as an example in my article as someone I wouldn’t mind collaborating with in some ways in the media war.”

Never mind the foul language omnipresent in your postings, for example “You fucking idiots” directly following the statement that you’d never form an alliance with the alt-right is nearly counter-productive as in: the expressed emotion in the second sentence undermines the genuineness in the first, you seemed to be quite stuck to explain to us that Cernovich is not alt-right. What kind of right is he then? It seems to me that in your maze of arguments you lost sight stuck on definitions.

I also would be very angry, mainly about myself, if one day I would wake up to find out that I consider a political alignment with a person that says about date-rape that it does not exist, that black women should be slut shamed if you happen to fall in love with one and that misogyny gets you laid.

If integrity would be a sheet of ice, your’s too thin to walk on. Mike Cernovich is on the extreme right, no doubt about that, so please let us not argue about some considering him alt-right. If you are justifiably at war with the common media, then it would help to demonstrate an alternative. You do no such thing.

    Thorsten Bredberg

    Written by

    I grew up in the 70s - I love books, records, chess and poker - I build stuff mainly out of wood