This is a bit tangential given the main subject matter here, which I agree with and think is excellent, but I dont understand how anyone gets past Julian Assange’s bizarre and revealing attacks on 911 Truth. He’s not Amy Goodman or Glenn Greenwald et cetera. There’s no career issue that keeps him from speaking honestly over that which there is no legitimate debate, -how the Twin Towers & Building 7 were destroyed on 9/11.
And he hasn’t just remained silent, he has repeatedly attacked 911Truth as “annoying” & “false.” That’s the end of story for Julian Assange as a legitimate figure. There is no ambiguity in the evidence so there should be none in his publicly stated conclusions on the matter. If the man can’t honest about what we know regarding the watershed event of our time, how can anyone take him seriously? No matter what valuable tidbits may come from his handlers. He’s a manufactured hero. There simply is no other plausible explanation.
‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.’ -V Lenin
Wikileaks, Julian Assange & Disinformation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HhWBTArG8U *not that I agree with all of this but it makes it very some very cogent points that should not be ignored.