Flexibility and future ready, not educations strong points, unfortunately.
Simon Youd

Definitely agree. I make the argument that (as Doug Belshaw would say) we need a certain amount of ambiguity in our theories and framing of pedagogy to be flexible for the future. A certain amount of “wiggle room.”

This usually doesn’t sit well with most. :)

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.