I may be being missing something here, but your criticism of Mr. Hancock’s piece appears to be invalid. He was very clear that his specific subject was the factual accuracy of the statements made by the competing sides during the campaign. If you’d like to hear his views on the various merits and demerits of the arguments advanced by them, I suggest that you ask him. If you wouldn’t, you could have just posted your views yourself. I remain of the view that his criticisms of the factual accuracy of the Leave campaign are material and valid. Feel free to offer me some evidence to the contrary.