I’d like to hear more about this?

Because the toddler in her article was a girl? Do you believe any of that wouldn’t apply to a boy toddler? I hope not.

Because the CEO is a man? Did you assume that all the marks on the CEO were supposed to apply to male CEOs and not female CEOs? I hope not.

Because the author is a woman? Do you assume that because one woman wrote something that makes you assume she’s unfit for CEO position that all women must agree with her and have likewise equally similar temperaments and therefore all women are unsuited for the position of CEO? I hope not.