I am glad to see that you mention the enclosure of the commons and “rent seeking”. What I want you to get is that land rent is unearned income in the hands of owners because they do not make land and they do not per se create its value measured in rent or sale price. Economists call land rent “economic rent” by which they mean unearned income. It is the flaw in capitalism which dealt with would make the system workable. Land is not the only source of unearned income but private ownership of the earth is still the largest segment of all unearned income estimated to be 40+% of GNP. There has been a movement around for well over a century started by the American political economist and social philosopher, Henry George, that makes the distinction between earned and unearned income suggesting that we shift taxation off of earned onto unearned income. This would be the way in a modern economy at the very least to take back the commons and provide more than adequate income at all levels to pay for government services with to enough pay for health care, education and a citizen dividend. Failure to make the distinction between earned and unearned income makes it difficult if not impossible in my opinion to understand why and exactly how the system is rigged to benefit the few at the expense of the many.