Sumant chhunchha

Hey Sumant chhunchha, I think that this class might be helpful for taking away some of the boilerplate with imperative subscriptions.

However, I prefer the approach taken by @fatsu in ngx-destroy, which seems to be inspired by this discussion.

In that module, a subscription for handling destruction is declarative and doesn’t require anyone to extend a class and end up with multiple inheritance issues. Here is an example of its usage:

I almost always prefer allowing your streams to declare how they will eventually stop emitting. In general, here’s my rule for “managing” subscriptions:

If all you are doing with a subscription is calling “unsubscribe” you probably should be using an operator instead.

But don’t let me stop your from your approach! Especially with streams, I think you should take the approach with which your team is most comfortable and productive. Thanks for your feedback!

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.