Hey Pete, I don’t have the chance to know you since I am in the “morning” part of the cohort. Well I’m going to tell you about what I feel when reading your article. I will be very straight. Excuse me. It is just the feedback of a non-US supporter.
The beginning of your article is very descriptive, which is useful for a good knowledge of the CLOU. Then I’d like to draw your attention on the vocabulary that you use :
- Mission: “I am participating” “I am here to contribute”
- Activities: “ I will participate fully by attending”
- Metrics: “Colleagues will see me participating in all scheduled activities”
- Time: “spend at least six hours each week”
- etc.
I find it very clear about facts. But at the end I have no idea about what you feel. Is it a pleasure or a torture? Maybe you try to protect yourself. And I would understand.
But I would like so much to know who you are and why you are here. Personally, I do not care about autopsy reports, even when they are understandable, clean, and filled-up zealously.
I hope I am not too hard.
