I do substantiate with fact. Please see links within my post. Will we ever truly know the whole story behind all this voter suppression and who is responsible? Of course not, and I write that in my post. Our political system is now occupied by lawyer-politicans who know only too well how to skate detection and therefore, responsibility. But that doesn’t mean that we suspend common sense and not ask which candidate is within the economic/political power structure and therefore is best situated to manipulate voting results. Bernie is against the Establishment. That is well-known. To suggest the Establishment would protect and prop its own (Hillary) is not a leap in logic.
I disagree with your assessment that Sanders does not have strong support in Brooklyn. Do you have a source for this? I don’t see it with the ones you sent me. Thank you for them, by the way. Also, I don’t recall reading anywhere that Bernie “rejected” his hometown. Many Americans move; we are a mobile society. I don’t think you can legitimately say he “rejected” his hometown.
Here are some additional sources you may want to read, especially the first one, which documents Hillary’s history of voter suppression and dirty tricks:
With allegations of voter suppression in Arizona, as well as questions about the Clinton campaign's tactics in Iowa…www.salon.com