Are Sign Languages Inherently More Honest Than Spoken Ones?

Visual grammar, Deaf culture and the idea of a universal language

Lucinda Munro Cook
A-Culturated

--

Two women having a sign-language conversation
Photo downloaded from Freepik Freepik | Create great designs, faster

The common room at the retreat is full of people, but silence reigns. Twenty minutes in, and out of nowhere, twelve people burst out laughing.

No, it’s not a silent retreat, it’s a signing retreat, and only three people there are not Deaf.

My American Sign Language (ASL) and Linguistics professor is hearing, the partner of a Deaf person is hearing and I am hearing, but I’m the only one who is dumb.

I’m in my second semester learning ASL and I’m completely out of my depth.

I’m having flashbacks to age twelve, plonked in a lycée in Paris with barely a word of French and sniggeringly called “La bête Anglaise” by my classmates. (The English primitive).

Now, as then, my brain is quickly overloaded trying to comprehend and it switches off, I tune out — until the laughter wakes me up.

I chose to ‘say’ dumb back there to illustrate how hard it is to talk and write about deafness or sign language with ‘vocabulary’ that is not hearing- biased. (I’ll be putting quotes around more examples throughout this article.) I could have written ‘I’m the only one who is handicapped’.

--

--